PnP is classic, with highlights

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you can dig this up somehow..

https://www.everquest.com/library/rz_rule_sets.jsp

might have it

Otherwise: no guild was disbanded for being dominant on live ever. Yes, even if they were as dominant as Empire is currently.

So you want us to follow your PNP except the parts you don't like, and your proof for which ones we should and shouldn't follow is solely based on your word.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh here we go someone quoted it

Source:




I win.

Again.

Link broken please try hard again.

[Pikrib]

nm working now.

[Nirgon]

No that message board is an active link and has quotes from the page that is now down.

Sorry about being right

[SamwiseRed]

That post is from 2005.

[Nirgon]

BK you are trying to get fear and charm into pvp on our timeline and truly believe it worked this way

Its probably the most glaringly obvious pvp change people would remember and you are bashing yourself in the face with it like a retard

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That post is from 2005.

But when was the set of raid rules created? It was in effect during raid PvP in Velious on Rallos Zek.

I didn't make it up out of thin air and I found a reference to it.

[SamwiseRed]

Where does it say it was in effect during Velious? Not seeing it.

[Runya]

Link doesn't work for me....2005? You must've cried for a pansy rule like that during omens of war or some shit

[Nirgon]

http://www.elitegamerslounge.com/hom...?f=180&t=87498

Kefyra wrote:
Alot of people have had questions about the Rallos Zek ruleset and also in regards to the SOE view of what part of each rule entails. Apparently, on each server, the gms have enforced each rule differently. I will break down the ruleset here and ask the questions that most people have had so that can make it more clear and if it's ok with Brenlo, Ashlanne and Kytharrea, repost it onto the other site for everyone to see. The following rules are the main ones that people interpret differently.

On Rallos Zek, PvP-related Play Nice Policy situations are expected to be resolved using PvP solutions. However, Non PvP-related Play Nice Policy issues, such as training, causing intentional experience loss, bind point, zone, and portal camping, as well as other various forms of harassment, are not permitted in the PvP environment.
The main question about this rule is mostly involving "causing intentional experience loss." After talking to various servers, it seems that gms have enforced this rule differently, the main difference being in regards to attacking people while they were engaging mobs. On Tallon Zek, the gms said it was ok to attack on mobs as long as you had a raid force large enough to kill the mob that you were attacking for. For example, say your enemy is engaged on Zum Muram in Ruined City of Dranik. You would not be allowed to send a group of sks to deathtouch clerics or what not ,because a group of sks could not foreseeably fight the mob alone so obviously there to make the raid wipe out intentionally, causing xp loss. However, if you brought your whole raid force to fight for the mob, you were obviously there to pvp and have every intention to fight with the intent of killing your enemy via pvp so therefore were not intentionally causing xp loss.

2004... going back 1 year at a time... it was absolutely in place during Rallos Zek's Velious