Play Nice Policy/LNS/RvR needs overhaul before Velious

[heartbrand]

The irony of the people crying for there to be a penalty being the people who would suffer most from their being said penalty.

[daasgoot]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The irony of the people crying for there to be a penalty being the people who would suffer most from their being said penalty.

It's not ironic at all.

I don't lobby only for things will help me.. Even thought he PNP assists the smaller guilds in being able to snipe mobs, i still think its some carebear shit and should be removed.

[Rednaros]

I think LNS is stupid and is used to ban fish
force lns is reasonable though

[Luniz]

the reason PnP was created was because Nihilum's toxic lock down of all mobs forced guilds attempting to break-in and contest being corpse camped

Now the argument is that competing guilds need PnP abolished to compete? ok

[Raev]

Small CS derail about the lag: when you have N players in a small space, the server must inform each of them about the presence of the other N-1 players. This makes it an O(N^2) algorithm, and basically you can't throw hardware at problems that are more than maybe O(N log N)

TLDR: don't expect buying a bigger box to fix your lag

[Fame]

read the first few lines, A-fuckin-MEN! Repeal this shit, take us back to the old days, exp loss on pvp death, no pnp and what the fuck is a GM?

[Fame]

How much time is pnp/LnS taking from the GMs through petitionquest? If more than 1-2 hours per week, fuck pnp.

[Colgate]

i'd say a good 95% of suspensions that happen on red99 are from PNP

at least 50% of those are falsified/retarded LNS "violations" that either did not actually happen or should not warrant a suspension

[Uuruk]

I'd really like to see KC be open pvp.

[Guide.Chroma]

Originally Posted by daasgoot_2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

good example of this is ferrott/fear

let someone die in ferrott, call force LNS.. everyone zones into or plugs into fear and waits for the opposing force to engage mob.

I'll look into some sort of answer for this leapfrogging behavior. Personally I think it's an exploit of the rules, and I would be inclined to say Sirken would agree (no guarantee there, I am the bottom rung on the ladder after all).

The idea is to loot and then leave, not loot and move forward. I see potential fixes to be the victor declaring the locked zone, or establishing an adjacency rule. I'm in favour of the first.