![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Its been a month and sky still falling, absolutely 0 measures added | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Box should be wiped and started again on solid foundations but wont happen, and either staff is lying to us about why theyre nerfing the xp or they have a really hard time learning from their mistakes So i mean, a new box with same old mistakes, whats the point. Need some new team to come out of the woodwork or a new game, heh. There wouldnt be a need to go nuclear on the server really. I hate to agree with Mostbitter but i do agree with what he was saying, if server was left alone instead of getting its xp nerfed a couple of times, we would have our 500 player server which they could then have tried to nerf xp on as an experiment. | |||
|
Last edited by Tradesonred; 03-19-2014 at 01:47 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
wtb reasonable exp.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Conspiracy theory: Red XP intentionally nerfed to reduce population gradually ahead of an eventual merger with Blue/Teams, to minimize crying from active players.
Also, a lot of these "new" ideas for Teams (underdog team XP/stat bonus, IP restrictions, etc...) were covered in depth in a giant thread I made six months ago: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=120312 This Teams ruleset remains the most comprehensive and best-received of any that has been proposed. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Do you guys really think enough new players will try AND STICK WITH teams to make it better than red is right now (let alone better than red will hopefully be when the stuff in the works finally hits live)?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
be cool to poll blue for people who would roll on Teams.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|