Fish is bad for you

[this user was banned]

I'm just gonna leave this here. (I really want to taste one of these fish!)

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

GE Salmon and wild brown trout breed creating hybrid fish

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by this user was banned [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm just gonna leave this here. (I really want to taste one of these fish!)

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

GE Salmon and wild brown trout breed creating hybrid fish

ermehgerd, want.

[JonathanHancock]

Originally Posted by Kagatobs [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fish is bad for you because of all the mercury we put in oceans. Stop eating it.

LOL you see any of the more recent news publications that actually telling us that "small amounts of mercury are GOOD for us" now?

Such ridiculous fucking propaganda. It doesn't even matter at this point. Either there's gonna be some REVOLUTIONARY new GMO science, that actually bring health BENEFITS to people and other organisms, or our kid's kid's aren't gonna have anything to eat.

Was reading another article the other day talking about a new species of genetically engineered salmon. The company was trying to get clearance to release them to the wild to spawn. Scientists were explaining how, since the salmon are so genetically superior to all other SALMON on the planet (having been cross-bred with various types of much heartier, open ocean fish) they would effectively extinct all other species of salmon.

As well as who knows how many other species of fish.

[JonathanHancock]

I'm pretty sure people won't still have their guns by then man. They're ALREADY trying to take them away.

Read the articles about Monsanto mounting legal offensives against innocent farmers who've had Monsanto's GMO seeds blown into their fields from neighboring Monsanto fields.

These farmers HATE this happening to begin with, because the Monsanto GMO crops start taking over their fields on their own. So really, this shit is happening NOW.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by JonathanHancock [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure people won't still have their guns by then man. They're ALREADY trying to take them away.

about time, how many more school shootings need to happen. not a complete stripping of guns but no citizen needs an assault rifle for anything....

and to say you need it to combat the invader with an assault rifle is crazy, then youll need a rocket launcher to fight his ar, hell get a tank to battle your rocket launcher and youll need a ground-air missile to battle the tank.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not a complete stripping of guns but no citizen needs an assault rifle for anything....

statistics have proven that assault rifles are used in a very, very, extremely small percentage of gun-related crime

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

statistics have proven that assault rifles are used in a very, very, extremely small percentage of gun-related crime

regardless absolutely 0 reason for a citizen to own an assault rifle.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

regardless absolutely 0 reason for a citizen to own an assault rifle.

http://news.yahoo.com/swat-clad-man-...125012440.html

[Korisek]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and to say you need it to combat the invader with an assault rifle is crazy, then youll need a rocket launcher to fight his ar, hell get a tank to battle your rocket launcher and youll need a ground-air missile to battle the tank.

You have that completely backwards between the rocket launcher and the tank. You'd need the tank first for the rocket launcher's primary purpose of armor-busting to be necessary. And why the would you pull out a ground-to-air missile (AKA anti aircraft missiles) for a tank?

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have that completely backwards between the rocket launcher and the tank. You'd need the tank first for the rocket launcher's primary purpose of armor-busting to be necessary. And why the would you pull out a ground-to-air missile (AKA anti aircraft missiles) for a tank?

The point > . < here

You're waaayyyy over.....















> . < here