Since when was trak a vp dragon? WTF IS TMO DOING

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hackscendence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was a troll. My previous statements stand.

If trak was over by the ledge because he had aggro on the ledge he would be moving to the ledge. He was beside it for the entire time save for coming up to gank unbrella once.

This statement needs proof. Its a story(anecdote). I could respond with Trak was moving to the ledge and often.

Your conjecture of us being bad players and training ourselves would make sense if we were the first to engage, but we were sitting on the ledge waiting for trak to reset. You require proof to say anything otherwise since you had the engage and, therefore, the player in the shroom room.

Your entire statement depends on me taking every story you tell as facts. This is why you need fraps.

[Hackscendence]

But then your stand-point would be completely illogical.

I agree, that this part of the arguement is your story versus my story, but that doesn't mean that your stand-point is any more logical.

In fact, it means that you're ignoring all of the facts that we have available to us and replacing them with a story. At least I've offered something of substance, your "Logic" is nothing more than misguided, UNWARRANTED skepticism, as I had previously stated.

All you have is a story. All I have is a story and 2 supporting facts. Therefore, LOGIC indicates that mine is the stronger case.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hackscendence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But then your stand-point would be completely illogical.

I agree, that this part of the arguement is your story versus my story, but that doesn't mean that your stand-point is any more logical.

In fact, it means that you're ignoring all of the facts that we have available to us and replacing them with a story. At least I've offered something of substance, your "Logic" is nothing more than misguided, UNWARRANTED skepticism, as I had previously stated.

All you have is a story. All I have is a story and 2 supporting facts. Therefore, LOGIC indicates that mine is the stronger case.

My standpoint is more logical because I can recognize that of all the stories being told none of them are supported by substantiating evidence. Your story does not have substance as you claim. Your facts in no way support your statement.

Although, I am glad you have conceded the fact that your claim is just a story. Skepticism wins again.

If you want to "guide" me provide evidence to support your claims. TMO engages first therefore they pingponged trakanon at shrooms? That is alot of leaps of faith to get to that conclusion.

[Rellapse10]

are you 2 srsly still arguing about logic....

[Godefroi]

Alarti had a meetic account, seems logic to me.

qft

[Hasbinbad]

Logic is the opposite of empiricism.

Just saying.

[Hackscendence]

TMO Engages a dragon, then it trains around for 20 minutes, resetting multiple times.

My arguement: TMO is at fault as they engaged first and had someone shroomed.
Supporting evidence: TMO Engaged First, Trak Banishes first to engage.

Your arguement: FE trained themselves because bad.
Supporting evidence: A story of inferred ineptitude.

Like I said, take LOGIC out of your arguement and we can agree to disagree. Keep logic in and I will continue to point out the facts that support my arguement LOGICALLY.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Hackscendence [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO Engages a dragon, then it trains around for 20 minutes, resetting multiple times.

My arguement: TMO is at fault as they engaged first and had someone shroomed.
Supporting evidence: TMO Engaged First, Trak Banishes first to engage.

Your arguement: FE trained themselves because bad.
Supporting evidence: A story of inferred ineptitude.

Like I said, take LOGIC out of your arguement and we can agree to disagree. Keep logic in and I will continue to point out the facts that support my arguement LOGICALLY.

nah my claim is that their is vastly insufficient evidence to support your claim.

[Godefroi]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nah my claim is that their is vastly insufficient evidence to support your claim.

We have a solid ass fraps of it all, I believe it has to be watched to see what can be used to show your actions on today's trak.

[Hackscendence]

But there's still some, right?

And some is better than none?

And that's how logic works?

I hope your shitty philosophy prof withheld your credit.