Asking a favor from the two top guilds on the server

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no one is going to agree to enforced rotations. gm's are not going to enforce rotations either.

GM's enforced a variance. The precedence for a rule set revamp is there.

What information are u basing this projected 'no one' off of, I know a few guilds who would love to participate in end game but refuse to participate in the mud slinging required to 'compete' as it is now.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

GM's enforced a variance. The precedence for a rule set revamp is there.

gm's don't enforce a variance they coded it. it requires no additional work for them. enforcing a rotation is additional work they have to do. an enforced rotation will not happen.

[OMGWTF420]

raid drama = website traffic = more people clicking on google adds

[kenzar]

raid drama = higher turn over rate = unsustainable population.

I can think of 2 large guilds worth of players that would still be playing on this server if it weren't for raid drama being what it is. Burst website traffic is nice, but a lower more constant traffic is better.

[Aaryonar]

Some servers had 0 enforcement of most play nice policy conduct. On Cazic it was pretty much get XP get loot in my experience, and trains were commonplace. How do we accomodate players that are looking to emulate that play experience here?

I feel that my suggestion is simply the path of least resistance, not the most ideal.

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by Aaryonar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Some servers had 0 enforcement of most play nice policy conduct. On Cazic it was pretty much get XP get loot in my experience, and trains were commonplace. How do we accomodate players that are looking to emulate that play experience here?

I feel that my suggestion is simply the path of least resistance, not the most ideal.

It caters to the majority, just like any successful govt.

[maverixdamighty]

gluck with your gm enforced rotation. nice to see this thread go off topic asking for gm intervention instead of players working together.

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gluck with your gm enforced rotation. nice to see this thread go off topic asking for gm intervention instead of players working together.

Again, you dont have the scope I and others do of the servers end game rule set evolution. Players working together has not worked from 2009-2013. What exactly makes you think it ever will?

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Again, you dont have the scope I and others do of the servers end game rule set evolution. Players working together has not worked from 2009-2013. What exactly makes you think it ever will?

I don't know that it ever will, but enforced rotations aren't happening and if they do this server will be the biggest carebear POS around. Congratulations on being in end game raiding longer than me on this emulated server. So you were in IB where was your "enforced rotations" threads when you guys were the top guild on the server? Please provide those links...

[kenzar]

Originally Posted by maverixdamighty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't know that it ever will, but enforced rotations aren't happening and if they do this server will be the biggest carebear POS around. Congratulations on being in end game raiding longer than me on this emulated server. So you were in IB where was your "enforced rotations" threads when you guys were the top guild on the server? Please provide those links...

I've always been adamant about a rotation. Even more so after joining IB and putting weeks of my life towards tracking mobs. Just because I worked within the system does not equate to me endorsing it.

Again you aren't attacking my argument. Your objection has been noted in the annals of time. Do you have any counterpoints to my argument?