People complaining about warrior agro,...

[Phallax]

Originally Posted by Gorgetrapper [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Blued Two Handed Hammer has served me pretty well, seems like most of you people don't know how to play a warrior pre-37. Before 30 (before the 2handed hammer procs) I've had no problem keeping agro on anything with just plain Bladed Thulian claws and some other random weapon in the offhand. All it takes is for the group to NOT be stupid, but that's a one in a million chance.

I think thats the whole point of the OPs post [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[jilena]

I think the reality of this is simple. Warriors a fucking inferior for exp groups. Seriously as a cleric I would rather heal a fucking necro BoD tanking the fucking mob than kill 40% slower so the warrior feels like he is accomplishing something.

Fuck you and your aggro. Learning to play for you = if you can't hold aggro just shut the fuck up and do your mediocre dps while the bard tanks so I can get my exp and move on. Sorry if that doesn't make you feel like the dashing hero of awesomeness. I am there to make exp not play fluffer to undergeared wannabe tanks.

That said, if you are the only person in the group somewhat capable of taking damage and the casters are dying because they are pulling hate, fuck them too. After they die 4-5 times in a row they will learn that you suck and compensate, or they won't make exp. Seems like a pretty win situation to me.

[holkan]

Originally Posted by jilena [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the reality of this is simple. Warriors a fucking inferior for exp groups. Seriously as a cleric I would rather heal a fucking necro BoD tanking the fucking mob than kill 40% slower so the warrior feels like he is accomplishing something.

Fuck you and your aggro. Learning to play for you = if you can't hold aggro just shut the fuck up and do your mediocre dps while the bard tanks so I can get my exp and move on. Sorry if that doesn't make you feel like the dashing hero of awesomeness. I am there to make exp not play fluffer to undergeared wannabe tanks.

That said, if you are the only person in the group somewhat capable of taking damage and the casters are dying because they are pulling hate, fuck them too. After they die 4-5 times in a row they will learn that you suck and compensate, or they won't make exp. Seems like a pretty win situation to me.

This sums it up pretty well lol.

[jilena]

Warriors ARE fucking inferior** Yay for laptop typing.

[Mady]

Damn Jil, what warrior pee'd in your rose bed.

[frefaln]

Originally Posted by Mady [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Damn Jil, what warrior pee'd in your rose bed.

Seriously. There's rants, there's flames, and then there's forgot to take your meds.

[Landis]

tbh i've only grouped with 1 warrior so far who could hold aggro reliably and he knows who he is. if a warrior isn't really twinked / higher level than the mobs you're killing than they're basically worthless as a tank.

[jilena]

Originally Posted by Mady [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Damn Jil, what warrior pee'd in your rose bed.

Haha no warrior, I just find this argument to be hilarious. I have liked most of the warriors I have grouped with. Just the people who think if there is a warrior in the group that they HAVE to hold aggro or the group is fail need to shut the fuck up. If the warrior gets aggro more power to them, but slowing down killing so the warrior can play tank is retarded imo.

[pickled_heretic]

warrior in exp group = welfare

[Gorgetrapper]

Well then Zarina, all those warriors you must have grouped with, twinked or not apparently don't know how to play their class.