And I raaaaaan, I raaaan so far awaaaayyyy

[Autotune]

Also, how do you get on the kill encounter log being the first DT'd?

I've never seen that one before, I thought the first person to take a DT would appear on their own encounter log.

That is how snipes have happened in the past.

Wait for a guild to send in their DT squad and be the first to aggro immediately after. That way you are on the encounter log with the kill.

This is new to me.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, how do you get on the kill encounter log being the first DT'd?

I've never seen that one before, I thought the first person to take a DT would appear on their own encounter log.

That is how snipes have happened in the past.

Wait for a guild to send in their DT squad and be the first to aggro immediately after. That way you are on the encounter log with the kill.

This is new to me.

I'm Pretty sure it was a timing thing, he took the DT as they were aggroing, before the server registered the mob to reset.

I want my barb hammer guys.

[hatelore]

But enough of the de-rail... So the new rule is, have fte and be sure to run your 4 or 5 men to the mob and braveheart it? Clarification humbly requested .

[Eccezan]

Originally Posted by hatelore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But enough of the de-rail... So the new rule is, have fte and be sure to run your 4 or 5 men to the mob and braveheart it? Clarification humbly requested .

How bout.............do what it takes to make a legitimate CT engage?

Legitimate = CC fear adds and engage with the amount of people necessary to actually kill him?

Not sure what there is to argue about when there was a GM WATCHING your bullshit during the raid. In another time...gm's watching what you guys did today might rule raid interference and you might be suspended for it.

Lucky for you they've gotten compassionate from the pathetic attempts your leadership calls competition.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure what there is to argue about when there was a GM WATCHING your bullshit during the raid. In another time...gm's watching what you guys did today might rule raid interference and you might be suspended for it.

I'm so glad those 2 are gone!

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by hatelore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But enough of the de-rail... So the new rule is, have fte and be sure to run your 4 or 5 men to the mob and braveheart it? Clarification humbly requested .

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is my face on every engage from now on.

[hatelore]

Sorry just saw your post ephi. I wasn't there nor am I trying to be an ass . Was just curious. Thanks for the clarification...

[doraf]

You guys should never let Altari and I post in the same threads. We are the masters of derail.

What if we did some type of random roll between the guilds. The winning guild stays and fights the mob w/o interruption assuming they can kill within a reasonable time. The other guild looks for something else. There is no more summoning a GM into every single raid encounter and loot stays on the guild that killed it.

[hatelore]

That sounds great, until you realize your raid force was in the zone first, and then the slackers who got there after you win the roll.

[Tasslehofp99]

Damn I had high hopes for this thread.