|
|
|
|
#1
10-18-2012, 05:20 AM
|
|||
|
That's pretty much what I just said, why are you echoing me now?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
10-18-2012, 09:34 AM
|
|||
|
It doesn't matter who wins. Everybody is going to lose.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
10-18-2012, 11:37 AM
|
|||
|
d) again... we still fighting out there. dunno if u know we were just attacked on 911 as well
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
10-18-2012, 11:43 AM
|
|||
|
Nothing is going to improve debtwise until deficit spending is eliminated entirely. And the only candidate who proposed that was Ron Paul (who also wants to cut up the credit card which is the Federal Reserve), so, whoever's elected will still put us further in debt.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
10-18-2012, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
__________________
Blue:
[60 Oracle] Kaludar (Barbarian) [35 Enchanter] Droxzn (Skeleton) [XX Rogue] Hailto (Half-Elf) Red: [21 Wizard] Hailto (Dark-Elf) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
10-18-2012, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
Just had to re-read the Drudge report headline like 4 times. For a moment there, I thought the electoral dick-waving was about to become quite literal.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
10-18-2012, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
FYI you're able to verify your eligiblity for foodstamps easily online, per state.
I invite anyone who considers themselves borderline low-income to check whether they fit the criteria. spoiler alert: if you don't have kids, you don't qualify. It's not as available and easy as it sounds. Before I started working after school, my mom had applied for them and was rejected. She nets approximately $20,000. Fortunately I'm able to help her out now, and I'm very thankful for that. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
10-18-2012, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
Congratulations, sir. You have learned the hard lesson of researching backward to the primary sources of your references. You introduced Robert Price into this discussion, not me. If you check your other primary sources, every one of them uses a qualifier. The Wiki entry is misleading at best. Personally, I would call the phrasing disingenuous; it is not representative of the statements made by the experts it references.
I don't recall asking for any such things. You're projecting onto me a generic argument you've apparently had with one or more atheists in the past. I doubted the historicity of Buddha, Jesus, and Muhammad. You took issue with that. You've gone on several rants full of ad hominem cuts. Your posts on this topic are rife with insults and both formal and informal logical fallacies. It's not me that has a big issue here. I actually think religion is very beneficial. I think it minimizes a lot of behavior that would be disadvantageous to me and the people I care about. It also provides tremendous opportunities in social networking. I know the Bible well enough to quote from memory and many people in my personal life would swear to you that I am a devout Christian. I might even be able to orate Pascal's Wager with a straight face. Nah, I'm not that good of an actor. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
