Americans and Guns (post pics of your armory !)

[Goofier]

Originally Posted by Lafoirfouille [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what is she doing !? These are INNOCENT STORMTROOPERS !

Oh, yeah, almost forgot...
The misfires are actually SnapCaps.
They're aluminum dummies with rubber primers.
You can dry-fire all day and not hurt anything.

And they really, really help train away anticipation flinching.
You just have someone else load your magazine and mix a couple in.

[Saddam]

ban em or make them even harder to obtain. too many tards out there carry weapons.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Saddam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ban em or make them even harder to obtain. too many tards out there carry weapons.

I agree. Make it ever harder to obtain legally. Only people to have guns should be the outlaws who use them for bad stuffs.

[HarrisonIsStillPosting]

Originally Posted by Saddam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ban em or make them even harder to obtain. too many tards out there carry weapons.

Your ancestors would be disgusted with you. Shameful.

[Goofier]

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=4ef6ce69ad6e" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

My buddy Tom with his Uzi.
Had to.
It was comin' right for us.

[JenJen]

what does owning a gun prove exactly?

[nilbog]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It means citizens retain power to overthrow a corrupt government.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It means citizens retain power to overthrow a corrupt government.

Which made perfect sense in 1776 when the pinnacle of weaponry was the single shot musket and cannon. In 2012, it's outright stupidity to think the citizenry armed with rifles, shotguns, and handguns have any chance at all against a modern trained army with access to clusterbombs, tanks, drones, and nerve agents.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which made perfect sense in 1776 when the pinnacle of weaponry was the single shot musket and cannon. In 2012, it's outright stupidity to think the citizenry armed with rifles, shotguns, and handguns have any chance at all against a modern trained army with access to clusterbombs, tanks, drones, and nerve agents.

Pretty sure this was nearly the same mindset of Vietnam btw (kinda pointless in this topic, but all the same).

How many soldiers do you think would kill their own fellow countrymen, especially considering most soldiers would agree with the majority populace if it came to a rebellion against the government.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure this was nearly the same mindset of Vietnam btw (kinda pointless in this topic, but all the same).

How many soldiers do you think would kill their own fellow countrymen, especially considering most soldiers would agree with the majority populace if it came to a rebellion against the government.

The Viet Cong were backed and supplied by Russia and China. Who is going to arm our populace with artillery, tanks, jets, etc. Canada and Mexico?