Ragefire Agreement as of 06/01/2012

[quido]

Yeah man, life is tough - that's why I RMT loot on p99 = easy.

[Lafoirfouille]

Originally Posted by Fists [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How's it going Jeremy? Still living off the government? Still finding it hard to get a job after all that jail time? How are those GED classes going? Hope all is well, take care!

Damn is this true ?

Visc~

[Fists]

I don't deny my end Jeremy, it's funny though that every single customer excluding 1 was in TMO though.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO member admitting to exploiting in IRC (again, he's done this often, nothing ever done about it)

don't forget me saying how i exploited wurm pathing.

If you aggro one and don't stand still and die, you exploit it every time b/c they path back and forth.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So what's your answer to Stealin admitting to exploiting, with your guild, Alarti?

Jesus did you get banned again?

My answer is you don't understand the server, or the use of the english language.

Stealin is claiming we use our understanding of guild mechanics to our advantage. Absofuckinglutely, we also stack magic resist on kunark dragons so we don't get feared. The way Stealin is using the word exploit would be stacking resists is exploiting too.
But carry on with your witless crusade.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rules lawyering when confronted with indisputable proof, and an admission of guilt, that you are and were exploiting.

Hilarious.

Being banned from the forums 5+ times but continuing to post here. Hilarious

Idiot who doesn't understand English. Hilarious

[Tanthallas]

"So basically you are saying TMO has no right to defend their position only BDA has that right."

So basically you are trying to argue with yourself now. You can deduce whatever argument you would like, but that is not the one I am making. What I am saying is that TMO is not defending their position, which has yet to be actually addressed in anything but comical and contradictory claims, but instead trolling to confuse the fuck out of people who were not there. Two thirds of the people reading this thread will sympathize with 'sorry, it was a mistake. I did not mean to train you." The other third know damn well that taking the FGs to the ledge or simply DIEING INSTEAD OF TRAINING THE KNOWN BDA AT THE LAIR would have been the obvious choice if the intention was not to 'indirectly' allow for TMO to kill ragefire.

Do you really expect people to believe that the members of TMO run around like fucking chickens with their heads cut off when they 'unexpectedly' have mobs attack them.

Do you really expect people to believe that EXPERIENCED RAIDING GUILD members do not consider the implications of their actions when these actions will affect another raid in the same area? Give me a fucking break man - the only thing on your mind is the other guilds move because it is COMPETITION.

"Simple facts (Ill break it down for those with weak minds) 2 clerics were watching for ragefire. 2 guilds went after ragefire. Guild A offered to roll on that ragefire to be fare. Guild B denied that opportunity and Guild A proceeded to kill Ragefire.

The fact that Guild B's cleric died doesn't even matter."

The fact that Guild B's cleric died, in itself, does not matter. The fact that Guild B's cleric was trained - intentional or not - does. This latter fact was admitted to - but thanks for the res after the fact bro. Nice guys.

"The main concern BDA has seems to be proximity to the mob they are tracking. That is an asinine position if don't be a douche is in order why is tracking from the ledge, the zone in, or anywhere a problem. The rule lawyers are coming from BDA's side this time. BDA is claiming you need to poopsock on the spawn point (and old raid rule). I will counter if you are going to be douche's about it you better have 15 on that spawn point."

I do not think this is what they have been saying at all. Yendor was pretty damn explicit, and so were the 'agreed' upon rules he quoted. Go reread them - that is, if you give two shits. Doubtful.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Eashan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know the next time you want to do rage fire and I will bring a few toons down there to help make things difficult for TMO.

BDA will pass on your generous offer Eashan.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Eashan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know the next time you want to do rage fire and I will bring a few toons down there to help make things difficult for TMO.

i was disappointed this post lacked $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"So basically you are saying TMO has no right to defend their position only BDA has that right."

So basically you are trying to argue with yourself now. You can deduce whatever argument you would like, but that is not the one I am making. What I am saying is that TMO is not defending their position, which has yet to be actually addressed in anything but comical and contradictory claims, but instead trolling to confuse the fuck out of people who were not there. Two thirds of the people reading this thread will sympathize with 'sorry, it was a mistake. I did not mean to train you." The other third know damn well that taking the FGs to the ledge or simply DIEING INSTEAD OF TRAINING THE KNOWN BDA AT THE LAIR would have been the obvious choice if the intention was not to 'indirectly' allow for TMO to kill ragefire.

Do you really expect people to believe that the members of TMO run around like fucking chickens with their heads cut off when they 'unexpectedly' have mobs attack them.

Do you really expect people to believe that EXPERIENCED RAIDING GUILD members do not consider the implications of their actions when these actions will affect another raid in the same area? Give me a fucking break man - the only thing on your mind is the other guilds move because it is COMPETITION.

"Simple facts (Ill break it down for those with weak minds) 2 clerics were watching for ragefire. 2 guilds went after ragefire. Guild A offered to roll on that ragefire to be fare. Guild B denied that opportunity and Guild A proceeded to kill Ragefire.

The fact that Guild B's cleric died doesn't even matter."

The fact that Guild B's cleric died, in itself, does not matter. The fact that Guild B's cleric was trained - intentional or not - does. This latter fact was admitted to - but thanks for the res after the fact bro. Nice guys.

"The main concern BDA has seems to be proximity to the mob they are tracking. That is an asinine position if don't be a douche is in order why is tracking from the ledge, the zone in, or anywhere a problem. The rule lawyers are coming from BDA's side this time. BDA is claiming you need to poopsock on the spawn point (and old raid rule). I will counter if you are going to be douche's about it you better have 15 on that spawn point."

I do not think this is what they have been saying at all. Yendor was pretty damn explicit, and so were the 'agreed' upon rules he quoted. Go reread them - that is, if you give two shits. Doubtful.

Maybe you should re read them it said if multiple people are camping him roll some dice....which is what TMO decided to do. Case closed super sleuth.