Lazortag booted from Nihilum for being bad?

[heartbrand]

First time train offense that was due to scareling port into temple: 30 day suspension.

Convicted and admitted exploiter/two boxer continuing to exploit: don't do that again bad boy

Sever confidence in fairness: all time low

Don't worry tho I'm sure there's some nobody Druids staring up trying to PL a melee alt in an abandoned zone that desperately need perma bans from server

[456]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

First time train offense that was due to scareling port into temple: 30 day suspension.

Convicted and admitted exploiter/two boxer continuing to exploit: don't do that again bad boy

Sever confidence in fairness: all time low

Don't worry tho I'm sure there's some nobody Druids staring up trying to PL a melee alt in an abandoned zone that desperately need perma bans from server

you outin me bro?

[Nirgon]

There's some consistency here that leaves quite a bit to be explained.

I don't think there's intentional corruption.

[Mornin3.0]

for vztz being so bad and lasting years... whats red99?

[456]

I support Lazortag

[Nirgon]

In the end of things, I'd love to hear what the top thinks the real reasons for any failures were and how they may have differed from my reasoning.

To be fair, really, I kept it constructive for a while and still .. well I'm not on team burn it down :P.

Too bad : /

[456]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In the end of things, I'd love to hear what the top thinks the real reasons for any failures were and how they may have differed from my reasoning.

To be fair, really, I kept it constructive for a while and still .. well I'm not on team burn it down :P.

Too bad : /

There is a rule on this server, you CANNOT QUESTION GM DECISIONS.


So enjoy your ban motherfucker.


<3

[Nirgon]

#1 - I'm not a mother fucker, sir.
#2 - I never said the staff was incompetent, incapable or didn't care.
#3 - I've clearly said there's no staff corruption that I can prove.

I merely say its unfortunate that so many people ended up on the wrong side of a decision with a certain party (who has been slammed numerous times for bannable offenses on this project) so consistently. I think that's just how it worked out, and it's a shame what has happened as a result.

Inb4 CUZ WE WERE THE GOOD GUYS, luls.

[Nirgon]

And actually you're totally allowed to kick and then PK a member for reporting someone cheating. That is not a warnable/suspendable/bannable offense. You can gkick or PK someone for any reason you want :P.

[456]

side of a decision

You are talking about a gm decision.

That's a bannable offense sir.

There has been a lot of petitions lately, a lot of posts on the forums, with everyone trying to critique GM Decisions. The developers of this project put way too much time into this for us to be put on the spotlight every single time we make a decision, ESPECIALLY when you ASSUME you know all the facts. 90% of the time, you don't. Situations are handled between the staff and the players directly involved. Any dialog between a GM and a player can be considered a private matter, and will not be open to public debate. Players will divulge their interactions with GM's as they see fit, maybe giving all details and maybe not disclosing all of it, and quite possible they themselves aren't aware of every point of consideration in a staff decision.

I'm getting quite tired of everything being questioned, everyone assuming they are experts in every decision being made. Its getting old quite fast. We make decisions based on our best judgements, often discussing large impacting decisions with several staff members first. You are welcome to report anything you may believe to be unjustified use of GM privileges to the petition forum or Nilbog and myself, but this would only be in situations where you believe a GM did not act as they are instructed so, and an investigation may occur, but do not think that this suddenly privies you to all information associated with any decision. I realize that the environment for our community is a little more open than such organizations as SOE Itself, with more direct involvement in the community by the developers, but there are certain ways things need to be handled, and they wont always be agreed on by everyone, but thats how it is in any scenario. Many of us, including myself, do not play on the server. That means we spend all of our time working to better the server, and handling the issues that arise. We make decisions based on our best judgement, with no favoritism for any play character connections, so you will have to trust in our opinions for the health of the server.

http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=3278