If pvp exp was increased, what % and why?

[Slave]

People in here arguing over nickle-and-dime exp changes when the underlying problems regarding grouping are swept under the carpet.

We're not going to have a legitimate PvP server without teams. Ever.

[Palemoon]

A group xp bonus (for full groups, not enchanter/cleric duos......) would do the most good imo. (if the devs decide we MUST have some sort of xp bonus, which im against).

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Slave [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People in here arguing over nickle-and-dime exp changes when the underlying problems regarding grouping are swept under the carpet.

We're not going to have a legitimate PvP server without teams. Ever.

Without an entire server of people on team evil aside from a few trolls on team good.

THUMBS UP.

Originally Posted by Billbike [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lot of the naysayers act like exp will be dramatically increased.

I think that 25-50% boost will bring the "time to 50" on red down to where it is on the blue server. At the moment, exp rates don't take in to account PVP.

This will do only good things for red. A certain obiese troll knows this, and that is why he is constantly trolling and trying to organize all the ignorant and or inexperienced players to his cause.

Roughly 3 of every 4 red players agree.

This. Turn on pvp + xp loss on the blue server and roll my character there. Let's see what kind of complaints can be generated about xp.

[Nirgon]

I dunno about when he was 42 vs 50s, but Bundy at 46 is very effective.

Rallos was 4 lvls.

Server shoulda been 4 lvls + item loot + planes (with manastone + rubicite) at launch.

[fiegi]

rallos was +/- 4

[Rogean]

So far, taking all the votes, adding them up, dividing for average (this includes the 0% votes), it comes out to 40%.


0 54 0
5 2 10
10 1 10
15 6 90
20 30 600
25 16 400
30 7 210
35 2 70
40 4 160
50 26 1300
75 2 150
100 51 5100

8100 / 201 = ~40

[fiegi]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So far, taking all the votes, adding them up, dividing for average (this includes the 0% votes), it comes out to 40%.


0 54 0
5 2 10
10 1 10
15 6 90
20 30 600
25 16 400
30 7 210
35 2 70
40 4 160
50 26 1300
75 2 150
100 51 5100

8100 / 201 = ~40

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Hovis]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So far, taking all the votes, adding them up, dividing for average (this includes the 0% votes), it comes out to 40%.


0 54 0
5 2 10
10 1 10
15 6 90
20 30 600
25 16 400
30 7 210
35 2 70
40 4 160
50 26 1300
75 2 150
100 51 5100

8100 / 201 = ~40

40% isn't bad but im sure a lot of the 0% votes are people that don't even play on red and are playing on blue (harrison)

and also Nihilum that are level 50 already and don't want people to catch up faster.

just an idea

[Bkab]

^i'm happy with that % if that's the plan

[Bkab]

btw, you guys crying about an exp increase will make people not care about getting banned act like it still will not take a full week or more of /played to get level 50 (not to mention completely re gear) even with a 40% exp bonus which is still way too much time for us normal fucking non-wheelchair bound mongoloid mouth breathers.