![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() well at the very least the 800 pound guerilla in the room was addressed.
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() U already ruined the Carpet with ur QQing bout almost anything in the past 6 Weeks, Mardum. Stfu, Idiot.
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() so whats the dilly dally on the best buy discounts is it true rogean's integrity can be bought for 10% off a "ernest scared stupid" DVD?
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() rieka stained the carpet when he/she spit out lovleys fat load, gotta swallow that shit if you want the lewts
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I gotta stop looking at his avatar before viewing Reikas posts Those fucked up druggy teeth make it hard to focus on his points | |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() Lol Holo banned... Well there went 35% of the population... Hey remember that time on the blue server when they caught a bunch of cheaters... They got deleved to 51 and a slap on the wrist... How many players was that again? =) Oh wait , but we were worried about blue's population..... Look at reds........ Big fuckin difference... Give Holo a slap on the wrist and let them return. If your gonna make special get out of jail free cards for other scum , you might as well do it to the rest. Let alone if you wanna announce the banning in the public eye , yet not release the cheaters names on blue??? You can make this entirely public and let the server vote if we want Holo members to come back. Banning them is stupid. Publicly is even more degrading to the cause. Please reconsider the measures. Or close red99 and fix the exploits and rerelease it properly. It amazes me how much more cheaters there were on blue who got off scott free. Very concerned....
| ||
|
#8
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() Publicly banning holocaust was the best move anyone could make. Hopefully they go troll star wars or wow emu -- follow in knuckles path guys, we dont want you here!
Thank you bugged Nagafen and Amelinda~ Well done guise! | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() It's an issue of consistency. Showboating a bunch of bans, and in the same breath claiming staunch adherence to a rule against discussing bans is inconsistent at best. Raising discussions about valid issues is healthy, and I'm amused that one person who is so in favor of free speech on the internet is trying to pretend that doing so doesn't help anything and even goes so far as to advocate arbitrary redefinitions of fairness.
That's just stuffing your head in the sand in blind fanaticism. | ||
Last edited by Uthgaard; 01-12-2012 at 09:04 AM..
|
|
![]() |
|
|