Newt- Winning GOP nomination? I hope not

[loopholbrook]

Every candidate except Ron Paul, Jon Huntsman, and Rick Santorum has now surged. Now that Newt has surged we can safely count him out. So now it's onto Paul, Huntsman, and Santorum. I think it's fair to count out the latter two. So it's looking like THE best candidate will get the nomination.

[Hailto]

Id like to see Paul as well, but I think its going to end up being Romney.

[Hasbinbad]

Bronson shot down. More at 11.

[G13]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bronson shot down. More at 11.

Nope

[Klath]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope

You accuse me of, and I quote, "engaging in blatant propaganda that would make Goebbels stand up and applaud" and then you turn around and try to pass off a quote from an obviously satirical blog as though it were genuine.

Oh, the irony.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[G13]

Originally Posted by Klath [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You accuse me of, and I quote, "engaging in blatant propaganda that would make Goebbels stand up and applaud" and then you turn around and try to pass off a quote from an obviously satirical blog as though it were genuine.

Oh, the irony.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are engaging in blatant propaganda

I made an honest mistake with that quote. I take responsibility for that. Instead of trying to use it as an excuse so you don't have to debate the merits of my entire post, why don't you refute what I actually said in the entire body of my post.

You pasted and quoted freaking Wikipedia like it's FACT and you want to play the source game now? Really bro? There is a lot of information within my post that you can't even begin to refute. Go ahead and give it a shot and let's have a discussion.

[Hailto]

Im pretty sure Klath breathed a sigh of relief when he noticed that one mistake you made in your argument, because he can now justify it to himself that its okay to not actually respond to anything you've said.

[Klath]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I made an honest mistake with that quote

You were spreading misinformation.

You pasted and quoted freaking Wikipedia like it's FACT and you want to play the source game now? Really bro?

Absolutely. Lets play. I pasted a quote from Wikipedia that had references to the original sources. You posted an unsourced quote that turned out to be from a fake news blog. See a difference?

There is a lot of information within my post that you can't even begin to refute.

The argument is over whether the stimulus helped or hurt the economy. If I have to choose between the opinion of IHS Global Insight, Moody's.com, Economy.com, and Macroeconomic Advisers and a guy in the Project1999 forums who can't fact-check his sources then I'm affraid you're seriously outgunned.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by G13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I made an honest mistake with that quote. I take responsibility for that. Instead of trying to use it as an excuse so you don't have to debate the merits of my entire post, why don't you refute what I actually said in the entire body of my post.

I am totally ignorant of what you two are talking about, and I fucking hate Bronson, but the man has a point here.

First he admitted his mistake, which - even if you think that is facetious - had to have been a hard thing for Bronson to do based on watching him in action previously (he is as stubbornly pig headed as they come).

Then he makes a perfectly reasonable request to not continue to employ ad hominem (however justified it was before his apology), and address the rest of his message.

Now I feel ill.

[Hasbinbad]

Adultery For Me, But Not For Thee: A Master List of Gingrich's Hypocrisies