Latest scientific consensus on intelligence, does it justify racism?

[pickled_heretic]

Originally Posted by burkemi5 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

also, as diggles already pointed out, correlation goes from -1 to 1.

diggles? what the fuck man.

[burkemi5]

Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

diggles? what the fuck man.

qq maybe you shouldn't all have the same avatar

[Diggles]

Originally Posted by Smilodon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Note : probably we can remove antifascism an dliberalism from some idiots ony if will kick their genitalies with stones just like that poor ape did [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[deakolt]

i find it laughable that OP ignored Csihar's post...

stupid fucking pseudo-intellectuals and their straw men

[Naez 4.20]

no pretty sure csihar got trolled there writing a novel in one of the most obvious troll threads

[deakolt]

my statement stands (a bit modified),

stupid fucking pseudo-intellectual trolls and their straw men

[Diggles]

lol

[Diggles]

the Diggles Diggle clusterfuck was fun

[Diggles]

and it's oh so wonderful~

[central scrutinizer]

There is no way to accurately quantify intelligence and if there was, there would be no way to accurately measure it due to the dynamic nature of brain chemistry. A subject could provide erroneous data for many millions of reasons that it would be virtually impossible to account for.

And if there was some magical method to somehow control the gathering of such data, trying to parse it along racial lines would only open up more variables to be accounted for.


This is magical thinking, nothing more.
Until we can upload ourselves to computers of course. Then we'll hash all of this out, and at the end of the day your agenda would still not be served.