Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2011, 04:57 PM
Yukahwa Yukahwa is offline
Sarnak

Yukahwa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 389
Default

Vztz servers never ran into twinks because they didn't last long enough. This server has the potential to be actually good..and that means it can sustain item loot. A warrior isn't going to win any pvp encounters vs casters while wearing crafted that he couldn't win wearing bronze. The naked pvp experience is a dumb argument.

We are all here because we like ever quest not typical panzy weak mmos. Real pvp with loot will be a good challenge for bluebies who have beat eq already. Without item loot pvp is just pve plus some more random interruptions to pve. No benefits..just inconvenience.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by juicedsixfo View Post
I take off the armplates on my ogre when I'm doin' battle cause I want them to see my guns
Last edited by Yukahwa; 09-19-2011 at 05:03 PM..
  #2  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:13 PM
Billbike Billbike is offline
Sarnak

Billbike's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukahwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Vztz servers never ran into twinks because they didn't last long enough. This server has the potential to be actually good..and that means it can sustain item loot. A warrior isn't going to win any pvp encounters vs casters while wearing crafted that he couldn't win wearing bronze. The naked pvp experience is a dumb argument.

We are all here because we like ever quest not typical panzy weak mmos. Real pvp with loot will be a good challenge for bluebies who have beat eq already. Without item loot pvp is just pve plus some more random deaths. No benefits..just inconvenience.
The VZTZ servers lasted quite a long time, and remember that exp was faster also. Plenty of time for twinks to evolve, but they didn't. Why? Because it was classic.

Tell me Yukakwa, what class and what gear would you say was an unkillable twink during classic?

I don't think you have ever played pvp. If you had, you would know where itemloot leads.
  #3  
Old 09-19-2011, 04:59 PM
XiakenjaTZ XiakenjaTZ is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 395
Default

I like no item loot best....

Best other option is loot anything not equipped including stuff in bags.

It would suck to lose say a manastone or something though. And I would not be carrying around situational resist gear.
  #4  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:03 PM
Amuk Amuk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 821
Default

Crafted vs Bronze you're clearly a high end player.

Most melee will wear resist gear not to be locked down, such as mithril arms/legs, tranix crown if theyre lucky - thatd be a fun one to lose, golden wolfseye bracers, etc etc - none of said items will stop a shaman from one shotting the rogue with ebolt, or at least ebolt+ maybe a VOS/and or pet dmg.

Most oldworld resist gear will help your MR and make you mobile, which makes you viable. A spell casters can be basically naked and still rape your shit up. In grp pvp with healers and shit it may make sense to wear your gear, but for the other 80% of the time it'll be naked caster gank squad.
  #5  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:12 PM
greatdane greatdane is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 684
Default

Yeah, well, itemloot causes retarded things like that to happen.
  #6  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:12 PM
XiakenjaTZ XiakenjaTZ is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 395
Default

I hate bagging too. What i mean though is allow looting from bags, just not stuff equipped.

But once again, NO ITEM LOOT IS BEST.
  #7  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:17 PM
Vile Vile is offline
Planar Protector

Vile's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,305
Default

If they gonna put in item loot let us open the bags.

Again, after that its either item loot or no item.. no crazy rules.
  #8  
Old 09-19-2011, 05:52 PM
Mardur Mardur is offline
Planar Protector

Mardur's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,304
Default

From IRC:

1 unequipped item lootable (from bags etc).
Level 1 chars pvp exempt within cities only (for trade).
__________________
I am Reiker.


lol wut
  #9  
Old 09-19-2011, 06:09 PM
greatdane greatdane is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 684
Default

It's still gonna suck for melees because you can't really PvE in resist gear, but it's better than real itemloot if there apparently has to be some form of itemloot at all. Don't think it's a good idea, but it isn't unplayable either.

Thoughts on shared bank since trading with your main char will be pretty much impossible?
  #10  
Old 09-19-2011, 06:11 PM
Rushmore Rushmore is offline
Planar Protector

Rushmore's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greatdane [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's still gonna suck for melees because you can't really PvE in resist gear, but it's better than real itemloot if there apparently has to be some form of itemloot at all. Don't think it's a good idea, but it isn't unplayable either.

Thoughts on shared bank since trading will be so annoying when it can only really be done on level 1s in cities?
yeah its just a good compromise for both parties though.
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD
"I will honor those who honor Me, but those who despise Me will be disgraced." HCSB 1 Samuel 2:30
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.