Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
Serverwide PvP Messages(including players, their locations) 105 66.46%
Zonewide PvP Messages(including players) 17 10.76%
No PvP Messages 34 21.52%
Other(explain in thread) 2 1.27%
Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2011, 04:48 AM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

VZTZ hit 330 concurrent at its peak, although it did allow 2boxing


the broadcasts (and global chat) helped the server feel alive and active, and IMO is one of the only "non-classic" things about any emu pvp servers that really worked


I think what will hinder pop is starting out in a zone with a handful of players in it, and not hearing anything from anyone for a long long time. The forums will become the new venue for trash talk and competition - it will just be less convenient and intuitive than if YT and global chat were in. I always felt like part of what made EQ PvP so great was the ability to freely communicate with eachother.

The only reason Verant didn't do it was because their servers actually had 1000+ people playing at the same time so logistically it wasn't possible because of the spam it would generate
  #2  
Old 08-25-2011, 09:52 AM
Misto Misto is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 347
Default

The main problem people have with Yellow text is the bullshit that follows with it in global OOC.

server wide yellow text / no global ooc
  #3  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:23 AM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,389
Default

If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #4  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:26 AM
Littlegyno Littlegyno is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
That is actually a good idea Emperor Rogean.
  #5  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:27 AM
johnny ringo johnny ringo is offline
Orc

johnny ringo's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
this is a great idea
  #6  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:50 AM
Convict Convict is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
I could definitely get behind this.

Also I liked your idea of quake sounds or w/e.
Maybe a server-wide broadcast if a player gets x amount of kills in a row with no deaths? "Soandso is on a RAMPAGE"
Last edited by Convict; 08-25-2011 at 10:53 AM..
  #7  
Old 08-25-2011, 01:56 PM
Crenshinabon Crenshinabon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Convict [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe a server-wide broadcast if a player gets x amount of kills in a row with no deaths? "Soandso is on a RAMPAGE"
Only if they have killed different people, so some corpse camping scrub doesn't look bad ass.

Also to program a system where a few kills happens in a certain timeframe or if more than 10 people are all pvping at once, where it says "There is action happening in . . ." Or whatever would be very awesome.

Seems like great compromise.
  #8  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:34 PM
Cwall Cwall is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If the reasoning for the broadcasts is to promote pvp awareness and not ego stroking then why not have a system in place that broadcasts big pvp battles. If several deaths occur in the same zone it could mention that there has/is a battle occurring in the zone with x players involved. Possibly mention guild names if it's a definitive guild vs guild.

Just trying to come up with ideas as a compromise.
I think this idea is pretty cool. Maybe zonewide yellow text to keep track of killshots and then when a certain number of deaths happen within a certain time frame, it announces to the server that x zone is a battlefield or something.
  #9  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:52 PM
Lasher Lasher is offline
Fire Giant

Lasher's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 953
Default

have the KDR recorded privatly and if a person with a low KDR gets killed it doesnt broadcast but ifs someone with a high one gets killed it broadcasts
  #10  
Old 08-25-2011, 10:58 PM
Tombom Tombom is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,083
Default

I just don't see why it is such a big deal to make global ooc/YT ignorable and move on with it. The people who don't want to deal with it won't have to, but people who feel it keeps the server feeling livley and active can enjoy it, there is really no downside.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.