Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[loramin]

You literally have one example in that post.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You literally have one example in that post.

If you really want I can find multiple examples, but we all know you will just dodge again. Unless you promise to admit you were wrong if I can find more?

Do you agree to admit defeat instead of dodging if I do this?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you really want I can find multiple examples, but we all know you will just dodge again. Unless you promise to admit you were wrong if I can find more?

Do you agree to admit defeat instead of dodging if I do this?

I'll promise to admit that I'm wrong if you provide legitimate evidence, that a reasonable person would agree with, that I am wrong. And that applies to anything, not this one point.

But I've already read the evidence: I've read hundreds, if not thousands of your posts already.

[loramin]

Are you five years old?

Spell it out for me: what terrible thing happened when a wiki page no one but you and four other losers read was "wrong" for a week?

I'll tell you a good thing: I didn't have to deal with this nonsense for a week [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you five? Spell it out for me: what terrible thing happened when a wiki page no one but you and four other losers read for a week was "wrong"?

They edited the ranking system specifically to troll OP and lower his rank. They didn't do it to improve the wiki.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They edited the ranking system specifically to troll OP and lower his rank. They didn't do it to improve the wiki.

See, this is the point were an ordinary person, confronted with overwhelming evidence, would change their opinion.

Any normal, genuine person would admit: "you know what Loramin: you're right, there was no harm. It bothered the hell out of me, but we're both rational humans who can see that no one was hurt in any way."

But instead you just double down on stupid, and this is why no one can have a meaningful converstaion with you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See, this is the point were an ordinary person, confronted with overwhelming evidence, would change their opinion.

Any normal, genuine person would admit: "you know what Loramin: you're right, there was no harm. It bothered the hell out of me, but we're both rational humans who can see that no one was hurt in any way."

But instead you just double down on stupid, and this is why no one can have a meaningful converstaion with you.

If no one was hurt, why can't we just change the wiki back? Nobody would be hurt.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you five years old?

Spell it out for me: what terrible thing happened when a wiki page no one but you and four other losers read was "wrong" for a week?

Didn't you know? The community suffered!

[loramin]

Why are you posting?

[loramin]

Serious question: what are you hoping to achieve by engaging in this conversation with me?