Chira numbuh wan!

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Deepseek's code was released to the public. -.-

If it doesn't meet expectation or was a complete copy of ChatGPT

"They going to know..

Nobodies going to know...

They going to know."

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Deepseek's code was released to the public. -.-

If it doesn't meet expectation or was a complete copy of ChatGPT

"They going to know..

Nobodies going to know...

They going to know."

it's just a kung fu joke my guy. don't overthink shit.

[Ciderpress]

I'm genuinely curious for botten to pose a hypothetical in which a tariff would be a good thing. I've noticed every other developed country in the world utilizes them in one form or another. Why are they all using such a dumb bad thing?

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm genuinely curious for botten to pose a hypothetical in which a tariff would be a good thing. I've noticed every other developed country in the world utilizes them in one form or another. Why are they all using such a dumb bad thing?

Try calling it a carbon tax. See how quickly he thinks we should impose more.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

If we are operating from the assumption that we are prioritizing deportations based on past criminal activity, going from the top down most serious offenses….

…then it is completely understandable that their home countries won’t want to accept them

U.S.A.: “Hey guys we have a serial rapist gang member who’s here illegally, we’re sending them back ok?”

Home country: “Nah we’re good on rapist gang members. But thanks anyway!”


I mean why WOULDN’T it play out like that every time???

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we are operating from the assumption that we are prioritizing deportations based on past criminal activity, going from the top down most serious offenses….

…then it is completely understandable that their home countries won’t want to accept them

U.S.A.: “Hey guys we have a serial rapist gang member who’s here illegally, we’re sending them back ok?”

Home country: “Nah we’re good on rapist gang members. But thanks anyway!”

I mean why WOULDN’T it play out like that every time???

Well, we can bus them to Kansas.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we are operating from the assumption that we are prioritizing deportations based on past criminal activity, going from the top down most serious offenses….

…then it is completely understandable that their home countries won’t want to accept them

U.S.A.: “Hey guys we have a serial rapist gang member who’s here illegally, we’re sending them back ok?”

Home country: “Nah we’re good on rapist gang members. But thanks anyway!”


I mean why WOULDN’T it play out like that every time???

Honestly I could respect that argument coming from the country having their criminals returned if they said what you just said. Instead it's like "no we will not accept these people who we totally think are great because it's really YOU who are the bad guy trying to protect your own people from our criminals." or some horseshit sophistry like that.

Once they start saying "nah we don't want our own horrible criminals back" in something like those words, I'll be on their side.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we are operating from the assumption that we are prioritizing deportations based on past criminal activity, going from the top down most serious offenses….

…then it is completely understandable that their home countries won’t want to accept them

U.S.A.: “Hey guys we have a serial rapist gang member who’s here illegally, we’re sending them back ok?”

Home country: “Nah we’re good on rapist gang members. But thanks anyway!”


I mean why WOULDN’T it play out like that every time???

Birdie website told me the whole deal in the recent one was about putting leg shackles on them. They got what they wanted from us and MAGA declared victory.

[Ekco]

he's pro EV tariffs, he has to be. can't not comply with the party line on that side.

they might be against them now though considering the dude they put them in place for switched sides cause his gay son won't speak to him.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1. Like private prisons?

2. You aren't being practical; you are still anything to own the libs mode. We are too far past this point and no planning has been done to bring back those jobs that no one wants. The orange man just wants these Tariffs to be seen as a collection from foreign countries when it is a collection from us taxpayers. His goal is tax relief for himself and his rich friends.

There is no such thing as a country incapable of manufacturing goods.

it took 25 years to turn china from a literal 3rd world hell with more mass deaths from starvation than any country in history... to arguably one of the most powerful countries in the world.

I would much rather live through 25 years of doing that to america, than filling the streets with homeless drug addicts and unemployed coders.

We. Need. Jobs.

We are not some divine species that is too good to do labor, so we need people from 3rd world counties to do it.