Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-25-2011, 08:48 PM
lethdar lethdar is offline
Fire Giant

lethdar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 753
Default

loool that is not how ghosting worked on live.
  #2  
Old 08-27-2011, 01:15 AM
Sniperfire Sniperfire is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 227
Default

instead of flaggin make it open pvp
sz rules
Last edited by Sniperfire; 08-27-2011 at 01:17 AM..
  #3  
Old 08-27-2011, 03:28 AM
Rushmore Rushmore is offline
Planar Protector

Rushmore's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

Macken > Harrison

And i mean to be critcal
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD
"I will honor those who honor Me, but those who despise Me will be disgraced." HCSB 1 Samuel 2:30
  #4  
Old 08-27-2011, 06:52 PM
Muaar Muaar is offline
Sarnak

Muaar's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

I think ffa is best if you don't want to work very hard to create a balanced and fair system, but would appreciate a well balanced system too.

As long as people can't exploit the rules you create in place of ffa where the COMMUNITY makes the rules (the BEST part of eq imo) it should work great. FFA in raid zones is a must.
  #5  
Old 08-28-2011, 11:30 PM
Greenkrak Greenkrak is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 157
Cool WOOT

Damn Im just super excited that a classic pvp server seems on the horizon.

My opinion is have no limit on the level range for killing.
  #6  
Old 08-30-2011, 07:11 AM
Mrcurtloco Mrcurtloco is offline
Aviak

Mrcurtloco's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 78
Default

The work you are willing to do for OOR healing is commendable but probly not needed.

Also that could be used to be exploited as well

ie. a low lvl player being zergd by a group of players in crushbone

I heal him and then stand next to him to get AoEd as well then rape the group.

It might make more since to code that for OOR healing if 2 boxing is aloud, but if its solo, I wouldnt worry too much
  #7  
Old 08-30-2011, 02:20 PM
Crenshinabon Crenshinabon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrcurtloco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I heal him and then stand next to him to get AoEd as well then rape the group.
If you are stupid enough to use an AE when an obvious higher lvl is sitting next to someone you deserve to get owned.

+/- 7 or even 6 levels please. This sounds a bit more fair than a lvl 20 fighting a level 28.
  #8  
Old 08-31-2011, 02:20 PM
Yukahwa Yukahwa is offline
Sarnak

Yukahwa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 389
Default

Rogean (i think) proposed a fix for OOR healers. It was proposed that when a heal is cast..the healer become PVP engageable by everyone that can engage the heal recipient.

How will this work when a high level character heals a low level character? A level 50 healer healing his level 40 PK buddy, and so on? Obviously it wouldn't help anyone if a level 50 could automatically be able to PVP whoever they want just by healing someone within their PVP range..

I guess the only solution is to only have healers / buffers become in range (by their own doing) to characters that are higher level than them..not lower. OOR healers healing lower levels are less of a problem in general I guess..

Or just make intentional OOR healing a bannable offense and not waste time coding to try to solve the problem.

Also I really think a tighter PVP range would be better. At low levels the power discrepancy is just too huge. Besides that, at low levels there is no natural clash between people 8 levels apart. No level 23 is going to be competing with level 15's for yard trash in Unrest...it just isn't necessary at all except MAYBE for loot mob disputes in Lguk and the like. Even in Lguk a level 50 group could and should simply kill whoever actually is in range and then take the camp they are after. If no one is in range they can just take the camp with their superior ability to do damage to the mob. I really think 4 is better. -maybe- 5 just to be unique or something. At that range everyone will be competing for the same mobs, and have a fighting chance against one another.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by juicedsixfo View Post
I take off the armplates on my ogre when I'm doin' battle cause I want them to see my guns
Last edited by Yukahwa; 08-31-2011 at 02:27 PM..
  #9  
Old 08-31-2011, 02:53 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

The issue is more out of range healing by lower level characters, or having a lower level bard follow you around. I don't think the population is going to be so high that either is a big deal and going 2v2 with a lower level healer on one side is a great idea.

Consider if you will a lower level /duel on a lvl 50 to break mezzes..
  #10  
Old 09-01-2011, 12:03 AM
Yukahwa Yukahwa is offline
Sarnak

Yukahwa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 389
Default

What is enjoyable about level 30 vs level 38? Totally different mobs and goals except that the level 38 might have the idea that itd be sweet to kill the level 30 for fun. Level 30 can either run..or thats it.

Most people that PK are going to pick one level and never move from that level. That will be a level where they have plenty of people almost if not exactly 8 levels lower than them to kill. Too easy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by juicedsixfo View Post
I take off the armplates on my ogre when I'm doin' battle cause I want them to see my guns
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.