Are we allowed to like AI art?

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just the bottom two are AI

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ekco]

yeah i don't know enough about art theory to even argue about it. but like when was the last time a human came up with "new artistic value" seems like 90+% of artists are just copying / emulating / remixing other humans art, just like the computer is doing, i don't really see the distinction

like in anime for example i can think of like 3 styles, and that's it Toriyama, Miyazaki, Shirow and like maybe one or two others.

and it's like that in every art form humans do

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yeah i don't know enough about art theory to even argue about it. but like when was the last time a human came up with "new artistic value" seems like 90+% of artists are just copying / emulating / remixing other humans art, just like the computer is doing, i don't really see the distinction

like in anime for example i can think of like 3 styles, and that's it Toriyama, Miyazaki, Shirow and like maybe one or two others.

and it's like that in every art form humans do

I hear you, you don't really need to know about any kind of art theory though. The reason I brought up the beatles specifically is because people often try to explain away their success by some factor other than their actual artistic output. "Beatlemania" was very much a real thing, and yet:

-None of them were particularly good looking

-They started as white guys playing black guy music in a sea of other white guys doing the same thing.

-There was no access to internet virality because it was like 1960.

Given the topic of the thread it seems interesting; what is the intrinsic value of any piece of art? Does it matter how it was made? I don't think it does, but the problem with AI art is that it can only emulate inputs. It's kind of dazzling and remarkable how quickly it can make something that is a facsimile of something people recognize, but I don't think it can ever push the envelope artistically. Or maybe it can and I'm retarded, I dunno.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Hey I had an Oblivion mod character who looked like this one time

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

^
The way they detect cheating programs in chess is that it will use the absolute best possible move for any give board state

I’m assuming AI will have “tiers” of intelligence that can be pre-set

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

These are some of the ones FB sends me, that I can post here anyway, others are even more risqué

I saved these so fuck, now I will see no end to them…

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Here your catgirls or w/e lol

[Ciderpress]

Why isn't it ever a really slick ai image of like a fat truck driver eating a sub?

(thats what i'm into)

[Ekco]

this dude put more hours into learning the correct prompt to make ff7 girls than anyone of us did making our everquest toons here. fuckin dedication
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ekco]

and this is how these are actually made, it's way more complicated than just typing shit into chatgpt or something, each node has sliders and shit and fucking up one thing will ruin the final image
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]