Are we allowed to like AI art?

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it's really lame that Ai has a style that I have never seen a human produce.

Meanwhile we think this style is theft.

Not one images has ever been painted in that style by a human before Ai.

idk most of it looks like it was trained on Parkinson's and the other DnD artists art when you ask for chain-mail bikini fantasy art like Ive been posting

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
could find better examples ^ but these two were the first that came up for Parkinson inspired

[shovelquest]

This is what I hate about Ai art style: These paintings are TOO GOOD. They're too detailed.

They don't look real... like real paintings.

They don't look like anything ever done before them.

This style is totally unique to AI and everyone says it's theft!


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ekco]

yeah it's basically as good / better than most artists already imo,

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yeah it's basically as good / better than most artists already imo,

Humans painting pictures of our overlords:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

actual overlords painting pictures of themselves:

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ekco]

i had to make a 2nd twitter account for my bot to use and ive only liked AI art on that account basically so it's just a constant stream of it in my "for you" tab and yeah some wild ass shit in there. lots of people are specializing in like one character and running it like a onlyfans account basically lol

[Ciderpress]

If you train it on graphics from magic cards I'm sure it will generate things that look like graphics from magic cards. The challenge is to get it to create some kind of new artistic value. That parkinson one of the EQ chick literally just looks like it scanned and translated the pixel order of the actual image, more or less. That's kinda like ehh ok.

It's fun to reverse engineer it conceptually. Like there are lots of apps that let you generate music in various styles, and it's really fun and easy to be like "make a song about eating grapes in the style of the beatles" and it will spit something out that sounds more or less like what you asked for. But then ask yourself what prompt would be required to get it to generate an actual beatles song that already exists? Like pretend the actual human beatles never existed, and your task is to get an AI to generate the specific song penny lane, what would the prompt be?

TLDR: This stuff is remarkable in many ways, but not actually intelligent in any meaningful sense.

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That parkinson one of the EQ chick

just the bottom two are AI, the top two are parkinson but his and the like 30 other fantasy artists since the 70s or w/e influence is in the art of the last 10 pages was my point in postin em

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just the bottom two are AI, the top two are parkinson but his and the like 30 other fantasy artists since the 70s or w/e influence is in the art of the last 10 pages was my point in postin em

Oh I gotchu.

But still, all the rest of the stuff I posted. I guess I'm mainly fascinated by the distinction between what people call "AI", and what would be actual AI, which is currently called AGI. But even AGI wouldn't be so great cause whose "general intelligence" are we emulating? Frank the janitor's? It gets heavily philosophic real quick.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh I gotchu.

But still, all the rest of the stuff I posted. I guess I'm mainly fascinated by the distinction between what people call "AI", and what would be actual AI, which is currently called AGI. But even AGI wouldn't be so great cause whose "general intelligence" are we emulating? Frank the janitor's? It gets heavily philosophic real quick.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just the bottom two are AI

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]