Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Casters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2024, 07:12 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

wiz can work on a semi afk playstyle if you can burn through your mana on a quad then afk while you med
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2024, 10:56 PM
PatChapp PatChapp is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1,162
Default

If you don't like quadding on your druid you won't like wizard. Wizards are a bit better at it,but it's the same thing. Gather 4 mobs,kill take a break.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2024, 01:52 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,504
Default

Every character I have outside my cleric (grouped extensively 56+) has been soloed semi-afk to the end. They were all pretty boring but the payoff level 60. My worst experiences have resulted the most fun/beneficial characters at the end.

If just going for an adventure I’d try a bard, whether you swarm, melee, or charm kill there is plenty of variety and running fast is as fun as EQ gets. It’s unlike any other class, in fact it doesn’t seem like the same game at all. Plus you need very little gear to make it work.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2024, 03:42 PM
bcbrown bcbrown is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
running fast is as fun as EQ gets.
It's such a fun feeling after you zone, start running, and then Selos kicks in with a drum. Feels like you're engaging warp drive.

Definitely not a boring low-attention class though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2024, 05:10 PM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's such a fun feeling after you zone, start running, and then Selos kicks in with a drum. Feels like you're engaging warp drive.

Definitely not a boring low-attention class though.
Totally, I have to be in the right mindset to play my bard. I like boring EQ, lol

People who have bard in their blood just operate at a difference pace.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2024, 02:20 PM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selene [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hello,

What is your opinion on the more boring class between Mage and wizard?

I had taken a break from playing the game for a while but am getting back into playing about ~2 hours a week now casually. I don't have the same drive for playing this game (or any for that matter) as I did before, but before I had quit, I played a mage up to 56 and got bored. The gameplay just felt too repetitive and simple as a mage. Also had a 58 druid, 52 pally, and 51 monk (the druid and pally were fun, until they weren't).

Now I don't want to play any class that would require too much investment/attention/devotion to the game (such as an enchanter or shammy), so I figured I'd ask if Wizzy is more "fun" to play than mage since I do think it suits a casual, semi-afk player perfectly. Thank you
I think dynamic fun gameplay and not having to pay attention or be invested are contradictoy, or at least at high tension with eachother. My recommendation is to have options for either priority, and decide which option to take each time you log in. For example quad the druid if you don't want to pay much attention, but charm on the druid or start an enchanter/necromancer/shaman for when you want to be more engaged?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2024, 04:08 PM
strongNpretty strongNpretty is offline
Fire Giant

strongNpretty's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Skatepark, WA
Posts: 916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selene [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hello,

What is your opinion on the more boring class between Mage and wizard?

I had taken a break from playing the game for a while but am getting back into playing about ~2 hours a week now casually. I don't have the same drive for playing this game (or any for that matter) as I did before, but before I had quit, I played a mage up to 56 and got bored. The gameplay just felt too repetitive and simple as a mage. Also had a 58 druid, 52 pally, and 51 monk (the druid and pally were fun, until they weren't).

Now I don't want to play any class that would require too much investment/attention/devotion to the game (such as an enchanter or shammy), so I figured I'd ask if Wizzy is more "fun" to play than mage since I do think it suits a casual, semi-afk player perfectly. Thank you
To answer this question directly- Wizard is more boring.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-29-2024, 03:04 PM
Balimon Balimon is offline
Fire Giant

Balimon's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 802
Default

Mage's can dungeon crawl in classic at level no problem, it's really in Kunark (with the lack of any real power gain) that mages fall behind there. Honestly I think OP is going to be bored with both classes. Try something you've never played much before IMO.
__________________

[ Kurrat - Arch Mage ]
[ Kurrate - Crusader ]
<Legacy of Fire>


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-29-2024, 05:13 PM
Duik Duik is offline
Planar Protector

Duik's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Near the largest canyon in the world!
Posts: 2,937
Default

Imma wait for Rimitto Stilskin to pipe up.
That shit is gold.

Just dont say its name 3 times.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-29-2024, 07:21 PM
Ripqozko Ripqozko is online now
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,070
Default

as a main mage, mage sucks outside of raiding and even then those that dont quad are less useful which is like half at least.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:48 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.