shaman duo

[Gloomlord]

Of course you can continue to act like a hypocrite without seeing the logic. Not saying you can't.

It's just indicating to us you are indeed a pathetic person who can't admit you're incorrect.

How on earth could you misinterpret what I mean with "you can't have it both ways"?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course you can continue to act like a hypocrite without seeing the logic. Not saying you can't.

It's just indicating to us you are indeed a pathetic person who can't admit you're incorrect.

How on earth could you misinterpret what I mean with "you can't have it both ways"?

I didnt misinterpret it. I simply disagree with your flawed logic that " if a person does X, it must be for Y reason!". That is a nonsensical idea.

[Gloomlord]

Are you aware of what the word "hypocrisy" means?

You're a "smart" man. I'm sure you can figure it out. It has nothing to do with "if a person does X, it must be for Y reason", but we already knew that.

Regardless, you know you've been checkmated here. I'm sorry you lack the humility to admit defeat.

Anyone else want to try reasoning with this creature?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you aware of what the word "hypocrisy" means?

You're a "smart" man. I'm sure you can figure it out. It has nothing to do with "if a person does X, it must be for Y reason", but we already knew that.

Regardless, you know you've been checkmated here. I'm sorry you lack the humility to admit defeat.

Anyone else want to try reasoning with this creature?

Yes, I know what hypocrisy means. You clearly do not, because you seem to think it is hypocritical to engage with an obvious troll such as yourself.

I disagree with that idea, and I believe this is why you keep acting like a fool on these forums. You have a very rigid ideology, where if a person does a specific action, it can only be for a specific reason. You ignore the complexity of human behavior.

I can indeed engage with an obvious troll such as yourself in an attempt to get you to see reason. Is it futile? Probably. Do I care that it is probably futile? No. I think you can redeem yourself, and I hope that you do!

[Gloomlord]

Troxx, you want to take over, man? Maybe another person telling him this will pierce through the insanity.

DSM clearly isn't clever enough to see he's been exposed for the millionth time already.

[Troxx]

This is fun.

Nobody wins discussing anything with DSM but it sure is entertaining!

[Duik]

DSM is trying to
A: Save the noob from "le bad info" from trolls and
B: Save the trolls from themselves so they can be better. He knows they (we?) can.
C: It takes one person telling him he is a clever troll (race!), for him to run with that. But 10's of others will never convince him he is, or ever could be wrong.

DSM: Damage Simulation Manipulator.

DUIK: Dispensing Unsolicited Inspiring Knowledge.

[Gloomlord]

Notice how he tried to tell people in the 4 man caster thread to "ignore the trolls"? Who in the hell was he talking to by that point? Nobody was on his side.

It almost seems like he has a psychosis going on.

[Guesty07]

Speaks into the void. Like the readers are all in agreement with him lol

[Gloomlord]

I notice how Reddit is like if the place was populated by people like DSM who are paid to control dissent using the very same arguing tactics and will downvote you to oblivion and even ban you if you go against the Reddit's agendas. Which is why I feel a particular disdain for DSM: I don't want a repeat of shitty people you see in Reddit like DSM in a forum like this.