NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by booter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

conveniently forgetting the classified docs felonies (which he admitted to on tape)

the actual election interference he committed

trying to literally nullify votes of americans (everyone should be pissed, this is sacred in democracy)

You don't really know much about what does and doesn't constitute evidence, do you?

"I really hate this guy so I want the allegations against him to all be completely true and I'm sure they are because other people who also hate him said they are" isn't evidence.

[Origen]

You know who does know what constitutes evidence?

Courts

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know who does know what constitutes evidence?

Courts

And yet, casey anthony was somehow found not guilty of murdering her daughter. OJ simpson was found not guilty of murdering his ex wife and ron goldman.

It's almost like........ they can be wrong.

[Ooloo]

Quick quiz: It's not only legal but constitutionally protected to object to election results. What did donald trump do that was illegal, and what proof is there to substantiate his guilt?

This *will* be on the final.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know who does know what constitutes evidence?

Courts

they don't seem to have much, it's all rather tenous. but the point isn't to jail trump, it's to complicate his life long enough to trash his chance at election, and to do so without making his base rally behind him.

dems are walking a thin rope here with this strategy, i know you aren't dumb enough to believe that they are a force of justice.

I've posted this video before, booter needs to see it and so do you i guess. this guy explains it all really well.

[Origen]

I didn't watch that youtube video and the fact that you think it's "democrats" doing this shit is pretty rich, like 90% of the people going after his ass are people he appointed.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know who does know what constitutes evidence?

Courts

What is justiciable?

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quick quiz: It's not only legal but constitutionally protected to object to election results. What did donald trump do that was illegal, and what proof is there to substantiate his guilt?

This *will* be on the final.

Hey Ooloo believe it or not I am not a judge

And I have to say this like, fifty times daily but no I'm not a lawyer either

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What is justiciable?

A word that can be spelled wrong a few different ways, look it up yourself

[Records]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...I've posted this video before, [...] this guy explains it all really well.

Wasn't this guy on 60 minutes a while ago, on a segment about fake news and people pushing misinformation online.

I think his post that he created was, "Hillary has Parkinson's, claims Physician."
But after they investigated the story, it was just a random physician and not a practitioner that even looked at Hillary in an exam room lol

And after they said since this is false do you want to say anything about this, like retract your statement, and he said no no it's true, im a lawyer i understand evidence. And the 60 minutes reporter said, well Hillary's staffers said it wasn't true, and he said "what Credibility does Hillary have?" And the interviewer said, what about you?

[Ooloo]

Origen don't care bout nothin!

Yes, this is evident.