20 Questions with a Lib NPC

[Jobaber]

What boomer ass tablet did you get that antiquated definition from?

There's like 8 incredibly offensive assumptions and racist generalities in that description.

[Kaveh]

Not being able to find a job is not grounds for claiming asylum, and if you’ve crossed the territory of a third country, you have zero claim anyway

America should take tax paying English speakers who are very attractive as immigrants. If you’re ugly, poor, or have an accent, well, better luck in the next life Jack

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Kaveh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not being able to find a job is not grounds for claiming asylum, and if you’ve crossed the territory of a third country, you have zero claim anyway

America should take tax paying English speakers who are very attractive as immigrants. If you’re ugly, poor, or have an accent, well, better luck in the next life Jack

Question 5:

What is first safe country in asylum policy?

The concept of "safe third country" or "first safe country" refers to a policy that requires asylum seekers to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter, rather than in the country they ultimately wish to settle in. The idea behind this policy is that it prevents asylum seekers from "forum shopping", or seeking asylum in multiple countries in order to find the one that offers the best chance of being granted asylum.

In the case of the United States, the current administration has attempted to implement a "safe third country" agreement with a number of countries, including Mexico and Guatemala, which would require asylum seekers who pass through those countries to apply for asylum there instead of in the US. The idea is that if a country is considered safe for asylum seekers, then the US would not be responsible for providing protection for those individuals.

However, the implementation of such agreements has faced legal challenges and some of them have been suspended by the courts. It is also important to note that the conditions in a country may change and a country that was safe in the past may not be safe anymore. The determination of whether a country is safe or not is a complex and delicate process that takes into account many factors, such as human rights, security, and stability.

[Jobaber]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question 5:

What is first safe country in asylum policy?

The concept of "safe third country" or "first safe country" refers to a policy that requires asylum seekers to apply for asylum in the first safe country they enter, rather than in the country they ultimately wish to settle in.

America has the 4th highest murder rate in the world, is this asylum actually safe?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

America has the 4th highest murder rate in the world, is this asylum actually safe?

Question 6:

America has the 4th highest murder rate in the world, is this asylum actually safe?

The United States does have a relatively high rate of violent crime compared to other developed countries. According to data from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), the United States has a higher murder rate than many other developed countries.

However, it is important to note that crime rates and safety can vary greatly within a country, and different regions may have vastly different levels of safety. Additionally, safety and security are not the only factors considered when determining whether a country is safe for asylum seekers. Other factors include the availability of basic needs such as food and shelter, as well as the presence of protection from persecution, including government protection and non-government organizations.

It's also important to note that the asylum process in the United States is complex and often difficult to navigate, and seeking the advice of an immigration attorney can be helpful. Additionally, the US has many laws and protections in place for asylum seekers, including the ability to apply for asylum, access to legal representation and fair hearings, and protection from deportation while the case is being considered.

It's also worth mentioning that the US has a long history of welcoming refugees and asylum seekers, and has a system in place to provide protection and support for those who are fleeing persecution. However, the current asylum policy and the implementation of new measures by the current administration make the process harder and less accessible.

[Trexller]

what the fuck is wrong with the modern democrat party?

I mean they have always been fucked.

democrats fought a war to keep black people in chains.

but seriously, WTF

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what the fuck is wrong with the modern democrat party?

I mean they have always been fucked.

democrats fought a war to keep black people in chains.

but seriously, WTF

Question 7:

Did the democrats support states rights in the civil war?

During the American Civil War (1861-1865), the Democratic Party was divided on the issue of states' rights. Some members of the party, known as "Copperheads", opposed the war and believed that states should have the right to secede from the Union. They argued that the federal government was overstepping its bounds by trying to prevent the Confederacy from seceding. They also didn't want to abolish slavery which was one of the main reasons for the war.

On the other hand, the majority of the Democratic party, known as "War Democrats", supported the Union and the federal government's efforts to preserve the unity of the country. They believed that the Confederacy's attempt to secede was illegal and unconstitutional and they supported the preservation of the Union and the abolition of slavery.

It's worth noting that the Democratic party of the mid-19th century is different than the current Democratic party, and the political landscape, issues, and ideology have changed over time.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Question 7:

lmao bullshit

if the democrats had won the civil war, your iphone would have been made by a black person who got whipped if they dropped below 10,000 iphones per hour.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lmao bullshit

if the democrats had won the civil war, your iphone would have been made by a black person who got whipped if they dropped below 10,000 iphones per hour.

I think the Lib NPC thing is only taking positions from critters from after the South democrats were expelled from Congress when the war started.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think the Lib NPC thing is only taking positions from critters from after the South democrats were expelled from Congress when the war started.

uhm, its you. you're the lib npc. you aren't taking questions and typing them into the liberal master brain AI.

these responses are copied and pasted from published sources and/or your opinion