Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2022, 11:36 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chortles Snortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so anything but shaman
got it (lol)
Still no Mages in OPs party. They picked a Shaman. This is such a bad troll lol.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2022, 12:12 AM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

My Toyota is faster than ur Bugatti. Let me post about it 300+ times and post irrelevant data to prove my point and demand other people post data that they have no way to obtain to prove something that's completely obvious to literally everyone

(Autism lol)
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2022, 04:54 AM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 683
Default

Why are we still here? Just to suffer?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2022, 10:14 AM
PlsNoBan PlsNoBan is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My Toyota is faster than ur Bugatti. Let me post about it 300+ times and post irrelevant data to prove my point and demand other people post data that they have no way to obtain to prove something that's completely obvious to literally everyone

(Autism lol)
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors

These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings
Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2022, 06:27 AM
Dogz_SS Dogz_SS is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 27
Default

Imagine thinking Shaman is a better damage dealing class than magician.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2022, 06:56 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogz_SS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Imagine thinking Shaman is a better damage dealing class than magician.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2022, 09:08 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogz_SS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Imagine thinking Shaman is a better damage dealing class than magician.
You’d be shocked and appalled what some people think. The shaman would have to work fairly hard to keep up with the mage pet over time by itself fight after fight after fight.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2022, 09:47 AM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogz_SS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Imagine thinking Shaman is a better damage dealing class than magician.
Imagine looking at DPS data on a video game, then flying into a rage and posting insults/memes for 200+ posts[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] That isn't directed at you specifically, but others such as Troxx.

As I have always said, from levels 1-59 Mage will deal more damage than a Shaman consistently due to the Shaman not having Torpor.

Current data shows a level 60 Mage's average DPS is around 80.

A Torpor Shaman can output 55 DPS during chain pulls, and 84 DPS anytime they can root/rot 2 mobs with Epic DoT and Bane. They could do this with summoning mobs too, you just have the pet and yourself tank the mobs with slow.

So yes, Shaman can indeed keep up with mage DPS depending on the situation, and Mage DPS is about 28 DPS higher than a Shaman in situations without root/rot. At level 60, 28 DPS is basically never worth it. If you are chain pulling mobs in Sebilis at 60 for XP, the Shaman can root/rot, so you aren't losing any DPS there. If you are killing Ixiblat Fer for a chance at Cloak of Flames, the 30 second faster kill speed doesn't matter. You want the better Slow/Malo from the Shaman to guarantee you win the fight.

EDIT: At 55+ a Shaman can do 45 DPS with JBB and Spirit of the Howler hehe, no mana spent, no Torpor needed. This level 56 Mage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhm9K-ePJAk is doing around 50 DPS with damage shield. So actually even before Torpor a Shaman can give Mages a run for their money.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-29-2022 at 10:03 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2022, 09:05 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,284
Default

3 more pages!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2022, 09:48 AM
Chortles Snortles Chortles Snortles is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 914
Default

g-g-g-g-guys just get your shm to 60 and torpor
(lol)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.