![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() But it's worthless, redundant utility. We've explained this time and time again, and he refuses to listen.
10+ people all "freak out" and unite against this man, and you don't think that's alarming? Is your self-righteousness really necessary here? Come on... | ||
#2
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
You don't actually have to provoke this person and drag this out, it's real easy to be like "I disagree" and move on. Why do you care this much about this dudes opinion? | |||
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
#5
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#6
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
In the grand scheme of things it doesn't really matter but people being this blatantly stupid and obtuse gets under my skin. I admit to having a hard time letting it go. Gloomlord made a good point a couple pages ago: Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||||
Last edited by PlsNoBan; 09-12-2022 at 12:28 AM..
|
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
#8
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Implying that increased DPS only matters if its enough DPS to gain an extra PH spawn is astoundingly stupid. I suggest giving up on that argument.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#9
|
|||
|
![]() It's over, DSM! We have the moral and intellectual high ground!
| ||
#10
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-12-2022 at 12:51 AM..
|
![]() |
|
|