Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's pretty wild witnessing this level of mental illness first hand. Reminder that DSM has contradicted himself and by his own admission invalidated his argument. His attempts to change the subject and backpedal and whine about perceived troll posters is just a deflection.

It is sad you have to keep insulting people who you disagree with, instead of providing evidence.

Posting conversations out of context is not winning the debate. It is a poor attempt at trying to win without evidence.

[Gloomlord]

I'm actually astonished how people are more patient than I am with him.

This guy is one of the most obtuse people I've ever seen on a forum, excluding paid shills that control dissent.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm actually astonished how people are more patient than I am with him.

This guy is one of the most obtuse people I've ever seen on a forum, excluding paid shills that control dissent.

You continue to dodge https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331 with insults.

You have yet to show why this isn't true.

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You continue to dodge https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331 with insults.

You have yet to show why this isn't true.

LOL he's still trying to justify why a solo parse is valid when the argument is about DPS in a group. Deflecting from the fact that he contradicted himself and admitted his 700+ post argument was incorrect.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL he's still trying to justify why a solo parse is valid when the argument is about DPS in a group. Deflecting from the fact that he contradicted himself and admitted his 700+ post argument was incorrect.

I am not deflecting anything. You simply believe you have proven something when you haven't.

You have convinced yourself that because other people agree with you, you must be right.

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not deflecting anything. You simply believe you have proven something when you haven't.

You have convinced yourself that because other people agree with you, you must be right.

The post history doesn't lie. You openly and clearly admitted shamans are only preferable for a small number of niche situations. The question was about the best 4 man caster/priest group. Not the best group for ixiblat. You posted a fallacious argument 700+ times and now you're unwilling to admit defeat even after openly contradicting yourself. You can keep trying to weasel your way out of this but I won't allow it.

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL he's still trying to justify why a solo parse is valid when the argument is about DPS in a group. Deflecting from the fact that he contradicted himself and admitted his 700+ post argument was incorrect.

Oh but but but....

'Solo parse is the most accurate way to gauge a class's group DPS. A parse done with a group is too susceptible to unknown variables"

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh but but but....

'Solo parse is the most accurate way to gauge a class's group DPS. A parse done with a group is too susceptible to unknown variables"

This is not an argument as to why you disagree with me. You keep repeating I am wrong, and you have convinced yourself that you have proven it somewhere, when you haven't.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=2331

I am waiting for your reply about this post.

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can keep trying to weasel your way out of this but I won't allow it.

As I said, you have no interest in having an honest debate. You just want to "win", because you think you are right. It doesn't mean you are right, you just think so.

[PlsNoBan]

1: You're the biggest troll here

2: Trolling doesn't invalidate facts

3: The quotes are well within context. You're just mad that you slipped up and accidentally admitted your argument is wrong

4: No evidence is needed when your opponent in the debate openly admits to being wrong (whether accidental or not)

[Gloomlord]

Hello Darkness, my old friend...