![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
![]() [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
#2
|
|||
|
![]() No data, just silliness. You can't win an argument that way hehe.
__________________
| ||
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
#4
|
|||
|
![]() DSM … all I gotta say is
LOL
__________________
| ||
#5
|
|||
|
![]() Nubs be nubs…
And the worst nubs are the pseudointellectual’s who think they be smert Nubs be nubs /thread
__________________
| ||
#6
|
|||
|
![]() this was a painful thread to read
| ||
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Why are you blaming me for your inaccurate data then? Lol the only silly person here is you Troxx. You give out data, and then complain that your own data isn't correct when the DPS for your Mage isn't great. Please provide better data if you think it isn't good. You say it undervalues the combine by 30%, but it matters whether most of that 30% is coming from you or the pet, because mana plays a factor in how often you can nuke.
I already told you how to get the DPS data, but you haven't provided it yet. Fight a single mob with pet only. Fight a single mob with pet and nukes. Report mana and spell usage. Report what mob you fought. All you need to do is divide max HP by how many seconds it took to kill the mob. For example, when I was duoing with a Rogue in Sebilis, he could kill a Froglok Dar Knight in 45 seconds. That mob has 6000 HP, so 6000/45 = 133 DPS. This thread is over until you do, because your own data shows Mage DPS as nothing special[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Another Mage reported 40-50 DPS with their pet, so the numbers are probably closer than you think. Reposting Shaman DPS. Quote:
__________________
| |||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-22-2022 at 09:48 AM..
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Raise your hand if you want an idiot shaman in your group root rotting adds all over your camp to justify their dps instead of just bringing a mage that can do more on single targets without training the camp and preventing mez
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
Last edited by PlsNoBan; 08-22-2022 at 10:20 AM..
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Raise your hand if you would prefer 10-20 DPS over heals, buffs, slows, and a better malo.
__________________
| |||
#10
|
|||
|
![]() Thank you for all the feedback. I think everyone has a lot of great ideas/thoughts on this subject. We went with shaman, enchanter and 2 necros. I'm the one playing the extra necro. I could have gone enchanter or mage, but with kids/wife it's nice to just feign death and afk at a moments notice. But I do agree in theory that possibly either of those classes offered a bit more than an extra necro.
| ||
![]() |
|
|