One change you'd love to see?

[Jibartik]

Would be amazing to connect that area in Freeport if archeologist euridites found the dungeon looking for magic they detected in their diggings.

[Jibartik]

Simple but excellent.

[Jibartik]

I would never abide to get rid of MQ because these types of expoitations are what seperate EQ from other MMOS, expanding what can be done by players.

I think that it also creates player driven economies where you can hire people to do things, and I think that > than you getting to kill a legendary quest mob easily on your own in a thriving MMO.

[Danth]

One direct change, and no more? Break /anon. Everyone's always visible on /who. That'll do.

Danth

[htabdoolb]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One direct change, and no more? Break /anon. Everyone's always visible on /who. That'll do.

Danth

Interesting. Can I ask your reason why? From the perspective of someone who plays casually and has a cleric main, being able to /anon for awhile and stop the torrent of /tells and requests for rezzes is a blessing I would be loathe to give up.

[Danth]

Originally Posted by htabdoolb [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Interesting. Can I ask your reason why? From the perspective of someone who plays casually and has a cleric main, being able to /anon for awhile and stop the torrent of /tells and requests for rezzes is a blessing I would be loathe to give up.

Sure. I want to know if a zone's occupied before I spend 20 minutes running there just to find half a dozen /anons. I accept your own issue you post; simply making a "/who all [zone]" query return an accurate population count without specific characters would suffice.

[Castle2.0]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure. I want to know if a zone's occupied before I spend 20 minutes running there just to find half a dozen /anons. I accept your own issue you post; simply making a "/who all [zone]" query return an accurate population count without specific characters would suffice.

Park mules in popular zones or /who a zone and ask the people in there how many people are in zone.

[coki]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure. I want to know if a zone's occupied before I spend 20 minutes running there just to find half a dozen /anons. I accept your own issue you post; simply making a "/who all [zone]" query return an accurate population count without specific characters would suffice.

You forgot to sign out your post dude wth? how am I supposed to know who wrote this?

Anyways , I'd Make the Sleeper come back with every Earthquake

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One direct change, and no more? Break /anon. Everyone's always visible on /who. That'll do.

Danth

This is a good one. I've said this to friends for years. Get rid of anon/role and let me see what zones are populated around my level. Let me get an idea if its worthwhile to make the trek to X zone or if its already overpopulated. Let me see what the class distribution is. There's plenty of reasons to want anon/role gone that don't involve using it to pester people for buffs/rez/ports. Also it'll trigger a bunch of neckbeards that think they need to be anon/role for their super secret 23 yr old raid content strategies.

[Xersius]

/guildwar