Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:35 PM
Gustoo Gustoo is offline
Planar Protector

Gustoo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The side of Bristlebane
Posts: 6,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Cops wait for a full hour outside for SWAT rather than to engage the gunman, going against police protocols for an active shooting

Police chief/captain/whoever mentioned his officers “took fire” but never once mentioned injuries, and almost always if there were any serious injuries they would be mentioned. So his lack of mentioning any probably means there weren’t any

I can picture one of the coward cops on his radio “he’s shooting at us, sir, what do you want us to do?” Oh I dunno….how about SHOOT BACK

If I was one of the parents outside having to listen to that carnage, that police barrier would not have stopped me from charging in unarmed to try to save my kid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sounds like some coward cops might go down hard in this one. Also, we don’t need laws to arm ourselves because we can trust police will come save us right
Yikes I want to believe that none of this is true.
__________________
Discord PVP Server:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
Lost but not forgotten.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:38 PM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yikes I want to believe that none of this is true.
It’s all over the news. Police are in heavy backtrack mode trying to cover their asses

I generally support the blue, but I’d be very curious to see the body cam footage of those cops that supposedly “took fire”, what that looked like, and their response

Apparently after “taking fire” the cops stopped trying to engage the shooter and for a full hour let him massacre a classroom while they evacuated other children like they were movie theater ushers and not cops
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:41 PM
Skarne Skarne is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Paul Allen’s apartment
Posts: 1,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It’s all over the news. Police are in heavy backtrack mode trying to cover their asses

I generally support the blue, but I’d be very curious to see the body cam footage of those cops that supposedly “took fire”, what that looked like, and their response

Apparently after “taking fire” the cops stopped trying to engage the shooter and for a full hour let him massacre a classroom while they evacuated other children like they were movie theater ushers and not cops
Yeah man I’m super disappointed with the cop’s reaction to the shooting. Absolute cowards. An hour holding back parents and even subduing a few of them trying to get inside to pick up their kids. Then they act like they’re the heroes.

“My cousin’s out fighting dragons, and what do I get? Guard duty.”
__________________
“The fundamental question is, will I be as effective as a boss like my dad was? And I will be, even more so. But until I am, it's going to be hard to verify that I think I'll be more effective.“- Little Carmine
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:49 PM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skarne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah man I’m super disappointed with the cop’s reaction to the shooting. Absolute cowards. An hour holding back parents and even subduing a few of them trying to get inside to pick up their kids. Then they act like they’re the heroes.

“My cousin’s out fighting dragons, and what do I get? Guard duty.”
Ya, if I was a parent having to listen to the gunshots ring out, knowing there are zero officers willing to go in there to try to neutralize the shooter and that my kid is in there, I’d either charge in unarmed or grab an officer’s gun and make them decide if they want to shoot me in the back as I rushed in

The parents of the victims are going to hold the cop’s feet to the fire on this one I think
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:41 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Cops wait for a full hour outside for SWAT rather than to engage the gunman, going against police protocols for an active shooting

Police chief/captain/whoever mentioned his officers “took fire” but never once mentioned injuries, and almost always if there were any serious injuries they would be mentioned. So his lack of mentioning any probably means there weren’t any

I can picture one of the coward cops on his radio “he’s shooting at us, sir, what do you want us to do?” Oh I dunno….how about SHOOT BACK

If I was one of the parents outside having to listen to that carnage, that police barrier would not have stopped me from charging in unarmed to try to save my kid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sounds like some coward cops might go down hard in this one. Also, we don’t need laws to arm ourselves because we can trust police will come save us right
I heard border patrol went in without the police's concent and they are the ones that shot him idk if thats true but they ride horses and dive into rivers so seems to check out.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:42 PM
Gustoo Gustoo is offline
Planar Protector

Gustoo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The side of Bristlebane
Posts: 6,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How about ban automatic loading weapons? I think that kills *2 birds.

You get revolvers, shotguns, and some rifles. But not repeater crossbows

(*good to eat)

I'm completely against anything like that because it is not evidence based (no documentation that it makes people safer) however, one thing for certain is that all weapons restrictions should apply to police and army personnel acting within the united states to have even a semblance of reasonableness. Anything else may as well state openly that it is an overtly pro authoritarian policy.
__________________
Discord PVP Server:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
Lost but not forgotten.
Last edited by Gustoo; 05-27-2022 at 12:47 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:47 PM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 6,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustoo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm completely against anything like that because it is not evidence based (no documentation that it makes people safer)
That must be why the US army exclusively uses bolt-action rifles.

Thanks for teaching me that.
__________________
lootmaxxed and eq pilled
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:59 PM
Mblake1981 Mblake1981 is offline
Planar Protector

Mblake1981's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Queen Ann
Posts: 2,970
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That must be why the US army exclusively uses bolt-action rifles.

Thanks for teaching me that.
If it isn't documented it isn't true and facts do not care about your unverifiable fee-fees.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:44 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 16,899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skarne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah man I’m super disappointed with the cop’s reaction to the shooting. Absolute cowards. An hour holding back parents and even subduing a few of them trying to get inside to pick up their kids. Then they act like they’re the heroes.

“My cousin’s out fighting dragons, and what do I get? Guard duty.”
Im disappointed Toy Soldiers turned out to be a complete lie.

Last edited by Jibartik; 05-27-2022 at 12:51 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2022, 12:50 PM
Gustoo Gustoo is offline
Planar Protector

Gustoo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: The side of Bristlebane
Posts: 6,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That must be why the US army exclusively uses bolt-action rifles.

Thanks for teaching me that.
If we're talking about military effectiveness, its obvious that a semi automatic weapon is superior to a manually cycled weapon. I would note that a revolver does well against other handguns and is of little hindrance to a skilled operator.

But we are talking about public safety within the united states, and this is the area where there is a distinct lack of evidence.
__________________
Discord PVP Server:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
Lost but not forgotten.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.