![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
You either do that or you let us kill each other without government interference protecting in and out groups. Sorry if I'm a fascist, not sorry. P.S. Don't get rid of guns. Make them a privilege earned. AND still do all the rest of it. Control the morons. You don't show up for work on time, you go to the work camp. Until you can earn yourself a new job. Where you show up for work on fuckin time. And stay the fuck of ur cellphone. And you don't have kids outside of a marriage between a male and a female for the express purpose of raising children. No one else has any other good reason to get married. We shouldn't have to be each others parents, here we at tho. | |||
|
Last edited by starkind; 05-27-2022 at 02:36 PM..
| ||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
for the reccord I think a little of both is all we need.
but the problem we actually face is american exceptionalism, which causes the nicest person to think that they are donald trump and own everyone, and that everyone is a scum scuker trying to leach off of them. it also prevents people from even budging an inch because they are the boss and because they are the boss they will NOT be doing what the other guy says, and they WILL be doing what the boss says! Then all the bosses complain after every shooting like, "WHY ARE MY WORKERS NOT WORKNG THEY SHOULD BE FXNG THIS PROBLEM FIX IT LIKE THIS: gives stupid clueless boss idea" everyone sucks and we all deserve what we get. | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
No, Elizondo that is impossible. If that law really happened in 2015 than the numbers of gun murders in Maine would SKYROCKET!!!!! Science as linked by Loramin makes it a guaranteed fact!!!!
Or wait, did people who murder people with guns ALWAYS stick them in their pockets WHENEVER THEY WANTED?! but if they did that they would be BREAKING A LAW?!?!! I don't get it. I opt out. Guns are bad. Bads are bad. bad bad. | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Saying someone who wants gun control cares about gun victims, while someone who is willing to try something else in the interest of trying something is a pretty petty thing to do and really only re-enforces my american exceptionalism is the problem theory.
| ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
You get revolvers, shotguns, and some rifles. But not repeater crossbows (*good to eat)
__________________
lootmaxxed and eq pilled
| |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Loramin I actually don't want to be an asshole towards you and kinda bully you in this way. I do get passionate about 2nd amendment stuff, because when it is approached rationally, the answer is incredibly clear.
It is difficult to find honest studies available anywhere about real world situations like the law passed in Maine despite that situation being a very very easy one to draw data from. When you do dig into statistics (look at Maine gun crime rates since 2015) the data virtually invariably shows no statistically significant increase in gun violence. The only rare exceptions are when there is a corresponding increase in police lead anti gang violence or other unrelated death increasing policies. There are many examples where "permissive" gun laws are passed, and no data is drawn or discussed. In all cases it is because the data goes against "studies" like the one you linked, that are nonsense. The federal "assault weapons ban" expired in 2004. It was the most restrictive gun prohibition in the united states ever, and never made anyone more safe. Passing such a law again would be a best case scenario for anti-gun people, but there is no data to say that 1994-2004 was a period of unprecedented public safety, because it wasn't. Just so you know, you can still identify as a die hard liberal and disavow a nonsense anti second ammendment viewpoint. Just like people can be conservatives and disavow the orange man (who is not a conservative) | ||
|
Last edited by Gustoo; 05-27-2022 at 11:58 AM..
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lol go back to the kid's table and color, do your best to stay inside the lines | |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|