Quote:
Originally Posted by Twochain
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We obviously don’t want to change the meta to something as bergzerg as camping 100 toons at each dragon, but laying out guidelines to not have to insta concede tracker fte should be a no brainer.
While we’re at it, what the hell was the deal with the “there are more guilds than just vanquish on the server” when we offered to let Riot compete against us for otherwise completely free mobs? Okay fine you can claim that we are trying to do away with bag limits, but Jesus Christ come on.. we were trying to show, in good faith, that we’re not just pixel lusting bloodhounds, and that we would rather possibly lose a completely free mob and allow Riot to go compete against us, as for most of us we play this game for the spirit of competition, not the loot. “God” reacts. Really???? Like fuckin really? I don’t even know how that’s a response. Like yeah, we know there’s more than one guild on the server, we’re trying to let them have a chance at something they otherwise wouldn’t be able to touch due to bag limits.
|
tracker FTE = immediate concede is a good rule because it removes any and all ambiguity into what the result should be. no need to figure out if you interfered with a raid, or trained anyone, or anything else. were you beyond the race line? if yes, automatic concession. remember which bots are where, don't be bad.
re: you second paragraph: bag limits aren't between guilds, they are a server rule. it's not up to you all to decide if you want to offer the ability to skirt that rule. acting like you have the right to decide that is another example of your guild's outsize arrogance, which, quelle surprise, people don't like.