I think it's pretty clear from previous and recent precedents set that even if done with ill intent, the punishment is pretty minimal, if anything at all. In fact, there's been a pattern that if the rules were poorly defined (and that's happened quite often where terms like 'immediate' engagement or engaging 'shortly after' weren't well defined), then the decision ends up as "it wasn't well defined, so let's just define it with more rules and requirements for next time but this time the guild that bent the rules and screwed another guild over wins and gets to keep their ill-gotten pixels." Basically the message is you can do whatever you want as long as you find some loophole to spin your way out of it.
| 
08-05-2021, 07:24 PM
Threaded Mode