Kriot wants even more charity pixels?

[remen]

Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bag limits on ring war as Vanquish desires would be charity pixels. There have been no ring war petitions since the rule changes.

I'm glad you brought up ring war. As others have mentioned ring war is no longer a competitive situation, just pure dumb luck, so bag limits have no impact on competition there.

Let's also remember that all of the petitions were from Kriot, whining and crying about about losing too much. They cried with baseless accusations of cheating to the GMs so much that the rules got changed to what they are now.

[xdrcfrx]

Originally Posted by remen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm glad you brought up ring war. As others have mentioned ring war is no longer a competitive situation, just pure dumb luck, so bag limits have no impact on competition there.

Let's also remember that all of the petitions were from Kriot, whining and crying about about losing too much. They cried with baseless accusations of cheating to the GMs so much that the rules got changed to what they are now.

Petitions from Various Guilds Since Last Mutual Raid Suspension in April:

Riot - 5/14 Dagarn (withdrawn); 5/14 Dain; 5/21 Yeli; 6/19 Vulak = 3 (4th withdrawn)

Vanquish (for sake of discussion, FRAG petitions counted here) - 4/17 Silverwing (withdrawn); 4/17 Dain; 4/27 Doze; 5/28 KT = 3 (4th withdrawn)

Kittens - 6/19 Vulak = 1.


Doesn't seem like Riot or Vanq are substantially different here; Kittens not overly involved at all. Vanquish wouldn't be spreading false narratives, would it? Certainly you guys are nothing if not straightforward and honest.

Note how most petitions are over non-ToV mobs since the inception of bag limits.

[remen]

Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Petitions from Various Guilds Since Last Mutual Raid Suspension in April:

Riot - 5/14 Dagarn (withdrawn); 5/14 Dain; 5/21 Yeli; 6/19 Vulak = 3 (4th withdrawn)

Vanquish (for sake of discussion, FRAG petitions counted here) - 4/17 Silverwing (withdrawn); 4/17 Dain; 4/27 Doze; 5/28 KT = 3 (4th withdrawn)

Kittens - 6/19 Vulak = 1.


Doesn't seem like Riot or Vanq are substantially different here; Kittens not overly involved at all. Vanquish wouldn't be spreading false narratives, would it? Certainly you guys are nothing if not straightforward and honest.

Note how most petitions are over non-ToV mobs since the inception of bag limits.

I was responding to Nexii's post:

"Bag limits on ring war as Vanquish desires would be charity pixels. There have been no ring war petitions since the rule changes."

I knew vanquish never petitioned over a ring war, I didn't know Kriot never filed a formal petition over it. Nexii was misleading by pointing to no petitions since the rule change.

[Allishia]

I think they should bring back fte lockouts so small guilds can form again and get things cheap instead of even the crap things going for crazy amounts lol. Wouldn't need 100 ppl zergs if lockout on fte and like an hour to kill it /nod.

[Nexii]

Originally Posted by Allishia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think they should bring back fte lockouts so small guilds can form again and get things cheap instead of even the crap things going for crazy amounts lol. Wouldn't need 100 ppl zergs if lockout on fte and like an hour to kill it /nod.

Agree it was a way less toxic era due to the meta. But it'd be tough to come up with a safe way to race in NToV while guilds are clearing trash there. I suppose rogues can run up relatively safely...

[Boptop]

Riot and Vanquish should merge, just kick out detoxx.

[k9quaint]

Not going to open discussions on bag limits or roll agreements until Straiker deletes.
No point in forming new agreements until Vanquish abides by current ones.

[Horza]

Straiker, show yourself.

[Synphul]

Saying the RNG 'favors' any particular guild is one of the dumbest things I've seen spouted around here. The is no bias in the RNG towards any guild. A winning streak is a winning streak. They could just as easily be on the losing side of that streak.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Synphul [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Saying the RNG 'favors' any particular guild is one of the dumbest things I've seen spouted around here. The is no bias in the RNG towards any guild. A winning streak is a winning streak. They could just as easily be on the losing side of that streak.

I knew there would be some dumbass arguing about the randomness, and yet here we are where a single guild has won almost ever roll.

Please think before you post.