Trio Suggestions

[Hasbinbad]

If you seriously think cle/enc/war has low dps, you don't know how to play very well.

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you seriously think cle/enc/war has low dps, you don't know how to play very well.

It depends on what you compare it to. Compared to replacing the cleric with a druid with DS, nukes, and dots, then yes. (Not to mention the regen, snare, sow and quick travel aspect.)

Now if you said specifically versus undead then a cleric MIGHT have a dps advantage but that's assuming the cleric doesn't need to heal much.
In a general all purpose situation though, I would pick the druid over the cleric.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It depends on what you compare it to. Compared to replacing the cleric with a druid with DS, nukes, and dots, then yes. (Not to mention the regen, snare, sow and quick travel aspect.)

Now if you said specifically versus undead then a cleric MIGHT have a dps advantage but that's assuming the cleric doesn't need to heal much.
In a general all purpose situation though, I would pick the druid over the cleric.

If you seriously think a druid - unloading everything he's got - could seriously outdps a hasted, dual-wielding, procing charmed pet, then I'm starting to agree with Karsten about you.

[Ferok]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you seriously think a druid - unloading everything he's got - could seriously outdps a hasted, dual-wielding, procing charmed pet, then I'm starting to agree with Karsten about you.

If you give haste and two fast weapons to a charm pet, I regret to inform you of what will happen when charm fails. Especially without snare.

Unless your group is extremely talented and coordinated (and well geared at that), that's going to end up being more pain than it's worth. Given, I haven't experienced charm on project 1999, but from my experiences kunark era-live (and beyond), that's simply a recipe for disaster. Of course, aside from that very rare, very skilled, very well geared enchanter.

Of course, if you're going to go that route, why not use a ranger rather than a warrior so you can snare your pet? Not like it makes alot of sense to heal a warrior when you can just let the pet tank. I seem to recall snare being something most enchanters wouldn't consider hasting a charmed pet without.

[CPTMULLER]

relative to sham/monk/bard?

[Spud]

i love threesomes

I would go high elf and erudite (brown sugar!)

[TheDudeAbides]

cleric
enchanter
mage/wiz/necro take your pick

anyone who thinks a melee is needed as a third with cleric/enchanter needs to L2P

[karsten]

the three pointers. NOOO, the three musketeers



WONTON TACOS

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by TheDudeAbides [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

..blither blather..

When you read, are your eyes open?
That's not what I said.
Twit.

[TheDudeAbides]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When you read, are your eyes open?
That's not what I said.
Twit.

I wasn't even addressing you bro or responding to you at all

Continue on with your regularly scheduled forum trolling/attention whoring brew

But lemme go ahead and address what you said

If you seriously think cle/enc/war has low dps, you don't know how to play very well.

DPS would be decent sure, but it's not very efficient to be honest. So less efficiency would = over time considerably less DPS than a cleric/enc/nec for example.

There. You win at the internetz