Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2021, 11:00 PM
Snortles Chortles Snortles Chortles is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2020
Location: BRoOKlyN
Posts: 1,023
Default

i had no idea about necro mez until someone told me
no way i would have thought to do that on charm breaks lol
maybe thats the beauty of the game
  #2  
Old 05-11-2021, 01:29 AM
Delekhan Delekhan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 58
Default

I'm sorry but to say people didn't know how to play the class in Era is a load of crap.
  #3  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:53 AM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delekhan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sorry but to say people didn't know how to play the class in Era is a load of crap.
__________________

Loramin Frostseer <Anonymous>, Hetch<Anonymous>, Tecla <Kingdom>, ...
Check out the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides

Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details.
  #4  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:41 PM
azxten azxten is offline
Fire Giant

azxten's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delekhan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm sorry but to say people didn't know how to play the class in Era is a load of crap.
Yes, this is provably false but a favorite distraction of the Enchanter defenders. There are tons of 1999 posts about people knowing exactly how to play Enchanter. They knew about CHA, mez to break, all the same stuff. The problem was it just didn't work like it does here. It was buggy, channeling was difficult, etc.

All of this is already proven. Evidence provided. Staff doesn't care. It's a moot point. Channeling on P99 is so ridiculously stupidly broken but the staff won't even say a peep about the evidence on this. Makes literally everything in this game 10x easier than it should be on P99.
  #5  
Old 05-12-2021, 09:35 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azxten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, this is provably false but a favorite distraction of the Enchanter defenders. There are tons of 1999 posts about people knowing exactly how to play Enchanter. They knew about CHA, mez to break, all the same stuff. The problem was it just didn't work like it does here. It was buggy, channeling was difficult, etc.

All of this is already proven. Evidence provided. Staff doesn't care. It's a moot point. Channeling on P99 is so ridiculously stupidly broken but the staff won't even say a peep about the evidence on this. Makes literally everything in this game 10x easier than it should be on P99.
The only actual evidence that has been provided is about channeling. The other “evidence” are random player posts from 20+ years ago that are contradicted by other player posts and guides (including one in era player written guide that calls Charm the most powerful spell enchanters have and details how to charm solo). Honestly the biggest difference is simply technology; the game was very laggy unless you had a great computer (which most people didnt) and Internet disconnects were extremely frequent (btw the latter helped to influence the “camping” meta that arose because groups didn’t want to move through a dungeon and have people go LD).

Btw where’s that treatise you told all of us you were writing with actual evidence that was gonna prove how charm isn’t classic? Lol loser
  #6  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:26 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,466
Default

Lazy degenerates who can't maintain a charmed pet
  #7  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:40 PM
Jibartik Jibartik is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 15,813
Default

Threads getting sad fast.
  #8  
Old 05-11-2021, 08:54 PM
Snortles Chortles Snortles Chortles is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2020
Location: BRoOKlyN
Posts: 1,023
Default

Everquest Arcade 1999
  #9  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:24 PM
RecondoJoe RecondoJoe is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 241
Default

I also don't think Monks were as tanky 20 years ago. Now keep in mind I mained a Monk named Zerazia, and a Rogue named Tajin... at no point did I ever feel like my Monk was a tank.. I could kind of tank on my monk... but I could also kind of tank on my Rogue by this same standard...

When I hit 50s the reason I chose to play my Rogue over my Monk was that they were both essentially melee DPS, but my Rogue did WAY MORE Dps than my monk... again I didn't consider my monk to be a tank... no one did really..

flash forward 20 years later and I come to p99 and Bebquix basically tanked for my cleric from level 8 all the way to level 50... like man I really dont remember monks being this tanky.. and my monk had pretty much BIS everything and was a super twink.. froglok crown, gator scale leggings, granite bracers, treant fists etc. the whole nine yards. Bebquix was running around in cloth armor tanking the fuck out of shit and I don't remember monks being that gangster, I really don't.
  #10  
Old 05-11-2021, 09:29 PM
RecondoJoe RecondoJoe is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 241
Default

i just googled this, apparently i aint the only one who noticed this

like had a monk, had a rogue.. neither could tank, rogue did more dps

mained rogue
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.