End Times

[Gwaihir]

Look kid. I'm not gonna pretend like we're intellectual equals here. You're retarded. I'm smarter and more educated than you in every single facet

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm smarter and more educated than you in every single facet

How facetious of you.

[Gwaihir]

Yeah. The word was chosen rather intentionally.

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah. The word was chosen rather intentionally.

Care to FaceTime?

[Gwaihir]

I gave you the link to read that yourself,firsthand. But you ignored it because you wanted to assert that you were right. You're wrong. "Nous" as a concept/Form predates Christianity entirely. In John, Christ is called the Logos (Reason) as the first emanation of the Monad, who's syzygy is Sophia (Wisdom). The idea predates platonism and Hellenism as well. All hermetic philosophy and Zoroastrianism asserts that God is Mind (Nous) and that we are connected to it like Hyper-V instances on a server

[Gwaihir]

The thing you don't understand is that the syzygy is not "split" it's two aspects of the same thing, inseparable, defined by the aspects' apparent opposition to itself, with neither anima nor animus having meaning without relation to each other

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The thing you don't understand is that the syzygy is not "split" it's two aspects of the same thing, inseparable, defined by the aspects' apparent opposition to itself, with neither anima nor animus having meaning without relation to each other

"Split perfect being" comes from the wiki and other sites. Yin and yang exemplify that but those are still dualities, not representative of what might lie beyond comprehension.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Split perfect being" comes from the wiki and other sites. Yin and yang exemplify that but those are still dualities, not representative of what might lie beyond comprehension.

It is said that "God Most High" is without Form, and without Knowledge, for knowledge is Habit, and Habit is limited, and on the same note Form is limited. So, for all intents and purposes the first Syzygial emanation of God, is the only God we should be concerned with, because one cannot "know" God in any greater capacity.

By the way, that's why Christ says "I am the Way..." (The truth and the life)
By the Tao, Christ is the Tao, Lucifer and Michael

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is said that "God Most High" is without Form, and without Knowledge, for knowledge is Habit, and Habit is limited, and on the same note Form is limited. So, for all intents and purposes the first Syzygial emanation of God, is the only God we should be concerned with, because one cannot "know" God in any greater capacity.

I didn't know that about habit, but I wonder if there isn't some double meaning in the word since it once referred to clothes in general, among other things, only now to be used in reference to the clothing of monks and nuns, men and women of god.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/habit

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't know that about habit, but I wonder if there isn't some double meaning in the word since it once referred to clothes in general, among other things, only now to be used in reference to the clothing of monks and nuns, men and women of god.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/habit

"originally past participle of habere "to have, hold, possess; wear; find oneself, be situated; consider, think, reason, have in mind; manage, keep," from PIE root *ghabh- "to give or receive."


Definitely