Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 01-31-2020, 07:03 PM
Smellybuttface Smellybuttface is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 320
Default

I just read through all the screenshots. Here’s my take on it....

Zubas came because he wanted to “camp bracer.” That doesn’t automatically mean he’s entitled to it.

However, in none of the screenshots do I see the party agree on NBG. It’s only referenced in the shot after Solemn was kicked from the group. I’ll presume it was discussed though, because Solemn states “NBG is literally GBN.” This implies he knew beforehand that NBG was told to the group. This creates a problem for Solemn, because it’s understood what NBG means, and that is that a player “needs” who can actually USE the item (as in wear, as opposed to simply “needing” the money from the item). I understand where he’s coming from since I too agree that any party member who’s present and involved in the kill should have a right to roll on an item that drops (regardless whether they can wear it or not).

That being said, if it WAS discussed prior that it was NBG, Solemn joined the group with the knowledge that it was NBG. Regardless of what his personal feelings are about NBG, he can’t arbitrarily decide to “ignore” that guidance and insert his own definition when it’s convenient for him. Despite whatever is believed to be fair, knowing the group rules beforehand and deciding to stay constructively means that you’ve chosen to abide by them.

All that being said, I think as a practical matter it was presumptuous of Zubas to join the group believing he was ‘entitled’ to the bracer. Absent even a roll, it’s clear he assumes he’ll get it if one drops. Now whats not shown in the screenshots is the roll itself, but I can assume Solemn rolled on the item and subsequently won the roll, which is why he looted. Not necessarily a ninja loot if he won the roll, but also not in keeping with the rules of the group set forth beforehand. Note, though, the party as a whole should agree on the loot rules. Simply because you’re the group leader doesn’t mean you get to unilaterally make the loot rules, especially when that rule only favors one person who you have a connection to (guildmate). Loot rules need to be firmly entrenched. If Solemn made no objection to the NBG rules though when they were told to him, then that’s a tacit consent.

TLDR: NBG is an inherently unfair system to group members that participate being denied the chance at loot, which IS useful monetarily even if they can’t use the items themselves. That being said, if NBG was discussed prior to an item dropping and was understood to be the rule of the group, party members need to abide by it (especially if they choose to remain in the group after learning about the rule, and as long as it’s discussed PRIOR to an item dropping). Solemn choosing to remain in the group after the rule was discussed, and presumably not objecting to it (as he chose to remain in the group), means NBG is established and he’s in the wrong for looting the item. The roll is inconsequential in this regard.
  #142  
Old 01-31-2020, 07:40 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Well Mr. Smellybuttface, I appreciate yours being one of the more objective takes, however...

Let me clarify a few matters of contention:

#1 Zubas didn't assume he would get the bracer or feel entitled. He had spoken about it prior and nobody needed it.

#2 You are correct, NBG was discussed before. Solmn responded snarkily by saying "I think you mean GBN". We said no. He said nothing more and kept playing. It seemed a resolved issue and he CHOSE to stay in group. This was when he first joined and the text had long been overwritten in the chat window or I had already spent enough time taking screenshots while I should have been playing. In any event, it is clear as you noticed, that he was well aware of NBG.

#3 Turns out he fucked over a bunch of other guildies earlier that day. He is supposed to be on a no group or res with Venerate. In fact, the day before, he fucked me over in EC. He promised to sell me something and I said I was a bit short on cash. HE started to send tells to everyone in my guild asking them to loan me the cash. Fucking lunatic. You see him in pic #4 admitting it. After a guildie who he didnt even know said he would, AFTER the guy wasted his time making a bank run to get me the cash, Solmn turns around and sells it to someone else because they offered 50 more plat...

#4 NBG isn't "inherently" unfair. As you said, it was agreed upon prior. Is it as advantageous for everyone to participate? No. As I said, I didn't need anything and play NBG. Why NBG normally with me? Because I usually either group with guildies or in group "friends". So, there have been many instances earlier in playing where I benefited more than others in the group with NBG. In a total pickup group of absolute randoms then many times its voted GBN. Whenever I lead a group and enough turnover happens, I call another VOTE. In a tie, the old rule remains. If people want GBN, then we go to that. There is nothing unfair about it. NBG can be more advantageous too. It all depends. Can you argue that in the long run that people can just greed roll everything and sell to get what they need? Sure, but that wasn't the case with THAT group as you noticed.

#5 There is a pic of some rolls. However, as you can see, if things were the way Solmn wanted it before he looted, there would have been 6 rolls, not 3. The only reason there were two others at the time from Solmn is because 1 was Zubas thinking that Solmn needed it so rolled against him. The other, just succumbed to Solmn's demands to roll after knowing he didn't need it, but if I remember right corrected himself after Solmn was kicked.

#6 Solemn is an astronomical fuckhead. Without even mentioning him, I have ran into NUMEROUS occasions of people bitching about him. Then when that happens and anyone sees the guy's name, MORE people jump in. Lol, try an OOC in EC to see if anyone has heard of the guy. The tales will go well beyond his obsession for ninja looting and GBN. He's just an old fashioned unwiped asshole through and through.
  #143  
Old 01-31-2020, 07:47 PM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Who the fuck keeps 1000 silver when they're overweight?

I knew there was something seriously wrong with you right from the beginning.
  #144  
Old 01-31-2020, 07:49 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muehler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this guy will claim need and sell the loot , or ninja the loot, he even trained the manastone camp and got a guy killed.
So to clarify to all you dopes that think this thread was made by me, I am not Muehler. Lol, I think I just got it. Mule. Clever. Anyhow, not me champs. If I have anything to sell it is with Kael and I auction it ridiculously cheap until it sells right away because I hate selling in EC.

So no, I don't have a mule or a Muehler... Solemn just is a complete fuck head that likes to abuse large colons any chance he gets. He is universally hated and it is amazing, even with such a shit reputation as Odus has, that they keep him around. I can respect a good troll, but this guy is embarrassing.
  #145  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:02 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I get invited to solb group.

Kaelseren <Venerate> replaces 40's cleric with a level 50 guildy (Zubas) so we can apparently farm the bracer for him while he sucks all our exp.

Enchanter still almost dies.

Bracer drops, I roll on it because that's the most fair and i'm not there to farm loot for their level 50 guildy.

I win the bracer, Kaelseren kicks me (was gunna leave anyway), starts spreading rumors.

Enchanter (Digital) tells me they wouldn't let him roll on previous bracers so I sold them to him for 100p.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=345468
Well as people can see from my previous screenshots of your incessant butthurt, you didn't appear to "gunna leave anyway".

We were at royals, what bracer drops there that Digital (The enchanter who you conveniently don't have a screenshot complaining about this bracer) needed? I don't see Digital rolling in your own selective screen shot. Oh and btw, your own screenshot shows 2 other group members telling you that you're a dipshit. Man oh man you reach levels of stupidity that I have never thought possible even in a 22 year old bootlegged video game.

You are such a moron or compulsive liar, probably both, that I didn't "replace" a 40's cleric with a 50's guildie. As my screenshots show, Sitand was our 40's cleric WHO WAS THE GROUP LEADER left when Zubas arrived. There were no healers available so Zubas was doing us a favor because he obviously didn't need the exp. He figured the bracer would be SOME reason to be there for other than selflessly healing for us.
Fucking dope. You are 100% selfish so you wouldn't understand.

What is amazing is not that you're a complete moron, but what is amazing is that you are such a profound idiot that you think other people will believe your nonsense. I am shocked you know how to operate a mouse and keyboard.
  #146  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:12 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Kaelseren may seek a trial by combat from brother Solemn for resolution given the information I was provided.

Accept or decline, the choice is theirs.

I hope they will be men about this and accept the honor duel, and let this trivial misunderstanding go.
Ummm, the only misunderstanding is the one you're perpetuating. Your shit grammar leaves it up in the air about "information you were provided". Whose information? Who gave it to you and what did it say? Some people could think that Solemn gave you info that somehow justified his BS. he of course obviously has none since his own screenshot shows him to be the fucktard he is. Definitely says loads for your guild.

More importantly, THIS ISN'T MY THREAD. THIS WAS APPARENTLY STARTED BY YET ANOTHER PERSON YOUR GUILD HAS FUCKED OVER. Why do you guys even pretend like you care? Do I have a manastone? Noooooooope. Has ANYONE ever seen me camp a manastone? Noooooooooope. Would I even want to waste my time camping fucking insane amounts of hours for something that is worthless post Kunark for non porters? Nooooooooooope. Do I go by Muehler or have a Mule (I am assuming that's what his name means)? Noooooope.

Get your shit straight before accusing me of starting this thread. In fact, why don't you fucking idiots post the screenshots that I EMAILED you? Don't worry, I just did...

Oh and yeah, I accept trial by combat by Solemn. Just in real life. That way he can stand behind his and his guild's bullshit. Set it up.
  #147  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:16 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He won the roll you moron
He didn't win the roll you asshat liar. It was an NBG group. Then again, you know this as I emailed you the screenshots. The same ones I just posted in this thread. If he "won the roll" there would have been 6 rolls. Where exactly is my roll? Your guild's bullshit is so easily debunked from your own exhibits.

I swear to be a member of your guild you must have to have the prerequisite of eating a bucket of lead paint chips.
  #148  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:25 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There was nothing shown to me about agreed upon loot rules. They obviously already petitioned and didn't get to suspend or ban him because the GMs saw he won the roll.

I am at least offering a trial by combat to resolve the issue. Take a hike Horza cuck.
Who petitioned, dipshit? I certainly didn't. I sent you the screenshots that you conveniently didn't post. Whoever the OP is with the manastone thing, who knows if he petitioned.

IN FACT, I told Archonus (an officer of your shit guild-Maybe you're him) that I wasn't going to petition because I wouldn't want to waste a GM's time over petty bullshit a guild should be able to handle. I then handed the matter off to him and Legendarymonk (Venerate) after he wanted me to email him the screenshots which I did. What was done after that I have no idea other than Venerate decided to put Solemn on a do not group or rez list. Being I am no longer in that guild, I don't give two fucks what they do with Solemn. Group and rez to your heart's content.

What I don't like is you saying I started this shit thread that has no screenshots or anything until ******I****** just posted them. If this was me, why the fuck wouldn't I have posted the screenshots YOU admit you got weeks ago? Holy shit you guys all have dogshit for brains. Do you guys actually think you're clever?

Lastly, shouldn't claiming GM's decided something which they didn't be an offense to get banned? Anyone have any input with that?
  #149  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:39 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Needs even more of Horza the cuck sticking his nose in it.

Solemn's story checks out btw.

Have I told you that I investigated their claim about how he "ripped one of them off" in EC?

They were taking a very long time and he sold the item to someone who offered higher while he was waiting. More theft!

Horza, you're addicted to (feigned) outrage, creating racial issues where none exist (disgusting) and a soyboy.
Well soyboy (Your obsession over soyboy makes you an NPC-Now what?), it is convenient you say his "story checks out" without giving any proof.

Your guildie making a deal, you know a contract to sell something, then harassing others to get the cash, only to sell it to someone else is yes, ripping them off. To get into lawyering, well because I know what I am talking about since I have the same conversations with judges, this would be a standard contract breach, ie ripping someone off.

I am having a hard time really believing you can be this stupid. You HAVE to be trolling people. Sadly, people are having their time wasted due to your guild's bullshit. Trolling is one thing. Going around harassing people you don't even know to get them to lend someone else they don't know is lunacy.

Glad to know that Solemn still loses sleep to still send me random tells informing me that I am "the worst" mage on the server [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (22.7 KB, 4 views)
  #150  
Old 01-31-2020, 08:46 PM
kaelseren kaelseren is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crevex [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
He won the roll and got kicked for looting it? If they agreed to let the lvl 50 cleric have it before hand then that is something different, but that doesn't appear to be the case with the evidence provided. Seems pretty shady on the groups part tbo. The venerate people attempted to take over a pick up group and monopolize the loot for themselves, boot the winner of the item, and them so flame the guy on the forums. Seems pretty scummy.
Huh? What proof? Evidence provided? Won the roll? Where is my roll? A super selective screenshot of 2 people, 1 not even Venerate bitching about the guy in HIS OWN SCREENSHOT is proof to you? Only 2 Venerate were in the group. Monopolize the loot? WTF kind of logic is this? I didn't need any of the loot from royals. WTF, can a mage use? How would NBG benefit me? Maybe, see the screenshots I provided forma. My God... Stay off a jury for all of our sakes.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.