![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: You have been selected for additional screening. | |||
| This flimsy mask will surely protect me. |
|
44 | 20.66% |
| I have or wish to have the Coronavirus. |
|
24 | 11.27% |
| I have some other virus; HIV or maybe viral Meningitis. |
|
7 | 3.29% |
| I am already dead. |
|
67 | 31.46% |
| On my way to Vegas, Randall Flagg is calling. |
|
32 | 15.02% |
| Mossad agents are dancing again. |
|
39 | 18.31% |
| Voters: 213. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
I wear a mask anytime i go to a public place. I do believe there is a new virus, I dont wanna catch it until they get better at treating it.
And really, why not? Especially when you can get masks as cool as mine! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Lune you can wear your mask all you want since its so effective. You can hide in a basement until there's 0 reported cases of any positive corona virus tests. Everyone else doesn't have to.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Ironically, the nations where people did simple things, like wear a mask, are now having to “be pounded into submission” quite less than we are!
really makes u think
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
What head of state of a real country has contracted and died? What super rich person has contracted and died? The reality is this virus is super treatable to ensure only the right people are taken out. Think of the price tag on universal health care. It would cost trillions upon trillions. If you take out the elderly, the chronically ill, the immune compromised, then that price tag becomes more manageable. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Lune, are you aware of any studies that have attempted to measure a causal relation between a positive COVID DNA test and actual symptoms? As a scientist I am sure you know that one cannot simply divide deaths by positive tests due to sampling bias, which is why in March Business Insider can say that the global death rate was 5% globally, 11% in Italy, and 1.8% in the US in comparison to the flu at 0.1% while the July CDC Estimate is now 0.65%. Do you know how the CDC is deriving their estimate? They must be trying to correct somehow as it's lower than deaths / tests, but on the other hand motorcycle deaths are now caused by COVID and African livestock and fruits are testing positive so I think it would be hard to get good data.
There is so much noise out there that I'm not even trying to read it all and am just going with my gut feeling that COVID is mostly media panic with very little scientific rigor, that the death rate is likely much lower than 0.65%, and that under 1% is hardly a huge problem anyway. We all die someday and I personally prefer quality to quantity of life, while wearing masks turns us all into unemotional, faceless slaves who can't communicate with each other. John Waters says it well. That said, I would be open to changing my mind if a well designed study showed the CDC has somehow significantly underestimated the rate of death or major symptoms. Also, JP has a bunch of really funny videos on COVID. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
Here is a list of recent headlines from various sources:
Everyone is down on Sweden. That's the official line coming out of our overlords. We must hate Sweden because. Because...they never locked down! We must be locked down and they weren't and we just need to point out how bad they did. Look how bad they did! Yes look: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] All those articles were written recently. Look in the mirror! Don't look through the smoke! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
For those too lazy to clack the lanks, Sweden has had 5,700 deaths with 10 mil population. Denmark 613 deaths 5 mil population, Norway 255 deaths 5 mil population, Finland 329 deaths 5 mil population. All suffered similar levels of economic damage. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
In a normal world, the headlines would read like this: "The UK has the highest deaths per capita, don't do what they did!" "Don't emulate Spain!" "Italy is suffering, don't let it happen here!" "The Belgian covid disaster, what happened and how we can make sure it doesn't repeat in the US!" That's in an ideal normal world, where media organizations don't do the bidding of their political masters. That's because in the normal world, the facts look like this: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] These facts also exist in our Schrodinger's dimension, but they box they're in has been shot through with agenda, so who can really tell what's inside? My point, just to be explicit, is that information is being manipulated to serve political ends to such a degree that we're approaching Goebbels, which is the second rung right underneath Stalin. Please note that New York and New Jersey have over THREE TIMES the per capita rate that Sweden has and all three places took the greatest hit in the same place; the aged in the nursing homes. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] "New York covid disaster, if we only emulated Sweden!" "Can New Jersey learn anything from Sweden?" How about those headlines? I mean beyond helpful and also totally accurate. I need a link though cause these exist only in my head atm. In the interest of not being misinterpreted further I'm not denying covid is a threat, not suggesting simple quarantine measures are ineffective, not suggesting anything to do with the efficacy of any countermeasures. My point is that like any crisis, this one has been co-opted by people with an agenda. Unfortunately these people control vast swaths of the media, which is why people are given giant loads of bullshit in order to make them compliant and scared in order to achieve a very visible political end, which is the election of a Democrat regime in November. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|