CORONAVIRUS Death Thread

[Baler]

Trying to enforce this mask nonsense will cause more deaths than it will prevent.

People calling the police on non-mask wearers like the SS is going to show up at their door. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Woke Locc]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trying to enforce this mask nonsense will cause more deaths than it will prevent.

People calling the police on non-mask wearers like the SS is going to show up at their door. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's very Orwellian

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Woke Locc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's very Orwellian

Don't be sarcastic it's other dumb meta / emergent behavior that is going to lead to the SS

that said, masks will become a fashion statement by 2024, much like burkas, great time to get on etsy with the mask business, then once we make friends with the chinese again, go for it, make your bankroll start printing money by investing in a chinese source with your newly established brand, ME or africa will replace the chinese tho as the producers and automators

u can thank me later by chipping in a fraction of a fraction of a percent of your income towards my veterans pension, or maybe like, directly supporting some other veterans (not me) some how.

Russia has the resources and the dying aerospace industry to churn out robots... and drones..., pro tip

this post is 100% free range organic economics, nothing political about it IMO incase u guys are feeling antsy n a lil trigger happy - all parties, affiliations, and groups seem to be getting in on this kind of post industrial wokeness --- its probably for the best

[magnetaress]

Agreed

[Gwaihir]

Step 1: contract Covid
Step 2: get over it like literally 99.92% of the population who has already contracted covid has
Step 3: move on with the rest of your life

If we assume the testing is a representative sample of the population on the whole, which has a case sample in the multiple millions, in the US alone now, then we can extrapolate the data to assume nearly 20%of the entire US population has already contracted Covid.

This means that there approximately 72million people infected already with just around 60k deaths.

This means covid has a mortality rate of 0.08%

Or is a case study of over 3million (nearly 1%of the entire US population) not enough for you fucking retards too stupid to understand basic biological statistical methods?

[Mota]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Step 1: contract Covid
Step 2: get over it like literally 99.92% of the population who has already contracted covid has
Step 3: move on with the rest of your life

If we assume the testing is a representative sample of the population on the whole, which has a case sample in the multiple millions, in the US alone now, then we can extrapolate the data to assume nearly 20%of the entire US population has already contracted Covid.

This means that there approximately 72million people infected already with just around 60k deaths.

This means covid has a mortality rate of 0.08%

Or is a case study of over 3million (nearly 1%of the entire US population) not enough for you fucking retards too stupid to understand basic biological statistical methods?

Considering how angry you are with our statistical abilities you make some wild assumptions about the data set you're working with, and some sweet cherry picking of that data. You're assuming a random sample and complete set when it's known neither are present. Any conclusions reached under those assumptions are open to further analysis and interpretation. If you made different assumptions you would likely have a different conclusion... I mean I'm seriously having to type this out? This is a core concept of stats. The fuck are you on about? You can't say we're bad at stats because you chose to make certain assumptions to reach your conclusion. Maybe we made different assumptions? No need for personal insults either, but if we're doing that maybe you're the fucking retard who's too stupid to understand statistics?

For example out of closed coronavirus cases (recovered or dead) in the US we have a 27% mortality rate. I can throw out "statistically correct" numbers that fly in the face of your .08% mortality rate conclusion. The mortality rate is likely nowhere near 27% though, just as it's likely higher than your .08% conclusion.


How are so many people fucking experts with definitive answers these days? You don't know shit about viral pandemics more than I do and you use "statistics are malleable" to it's textbook definition. The god damn armchair quarterbacks have evolved into internet oracles.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Mota [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Considering how angry you are with our statistical abilities you make some wild assumptions about the data set you're working with, and some sweet cherry picking of that data. You're assuming a random sample and complete set when it's known neither are present. Any conclusions reached under those assumptions are open to further analysis and interpretation. If you made different assumptions you would likely have a different conclusion... I mean I'm seriously having to type this out? This is a core concept of stats. The fuck are you on about? You can't say we're bad at stats because you chose to make certain assumptions to reach your conclusion. Maybe we made different assumptions? No need for personal insults either, but if we're doing that maybe you're the fucking retard who's too stupid to understand statistics?

For example out of closed coronavirus cases (recovered or dead) in the US we have a 27% mortality rate. I can throw out "statistically correct" numbers that fly in the face of your .08% mortality rate conclusion. The mortality rate is likely nowhere near 27% though, just as it's likely higher than your .08% conclusion.


How are so many people fucking experts with definitive answers these days? You don't know shit about viral pandemics more than I do and you use "statistics are malleable" to it's textbook definition. The god damn armchair quarterbacks have evolved into internet oracles.

Typical shill response. Lets assume the data set is biased towards those suspectung they are infected, instead fearmongering hypchondriacs, and lets assume its off by a magnitude of 500%.

This shit is at best a 0.4% mortality rate, and is laudibly variating from the stated 3.5% it started out being toted as.

The data on the confirmed vs dead doesnt even match up to the originally projected mortality rate, yet the circus goes on.

[Bigsham]

You dont die from covid you die from complications while your sick for 7 weeks

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Bigsham [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You dont die from covid you die from complications while your sick for 7 weeks

Yeah, theyre already counting that, as evidenced in the marked decline in other illness categories.

Do we count suicide, and deaths caused by economic catastrophe as well?

Goalposts.

[Gustoo]

If anyone dies from covid in game, I am offering free rezzes.

#allinthistogether

Sipping chardonnay from my manastone wineglass.