![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Potatus / Havona <Castle> / Seaglass <Castle> / Tala / Havona
Quote:
| ||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() i agree with you on the merging to blue part but not your argument about the economy for the simple fact that green/teal will have the EXACT same economy eventually as well, the same douchbags that ruined blues economy will and have already started ruining the new servers economy, just look at some of the prices these ppl are asking for easy to get items already.
| ||
|
#3
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() I agree that they shouldn't merge Green with Blue. Instead, they should permanently wipe all characters before opening Green 2.0 to bring EverQuest more in line with the natural cycle of life and death and prevent people from becoming too attached to their pixels.
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() but what about my manastone?!
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() top blue builds can barely scrape two lockets together but long kunark was definitely the source of mudflation and not some a problem that's intrinsic to everquest, a game with no systemic way of removing items from the game
__________________
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() I think current Green server+data should stay. At the end of Velious Green 2.0 will come, which would eventually merge with original green. And so on.
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Most people will probably just start on the new server tbh.
I never logged my blue chars again since green. and I have put quite some time into them. I just don't see a reason why. Green is more fun. *shrugs* | ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Now I am fine if they just merge green with green 2.0 and keep doing it that way. The main thing I don’t want is for us to eventually have like 6 servers... Green Blue Green 2.0 Teal Red Green 3.0
__________________
Octopath Traveler
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
![]() It’s fine, pantheon will be out by then and no one will care about green merging with anything.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|