![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Even besides AE kiting, bard charm kiting is the most efficient out of any charms, in any era. Up to 20 ish, most melees will be doing similar damage due to lack of gearing. If anything, a bard meleeing + singing dmg song (maybe swapping out instrument on pulse) would outdamage normal melee at lower levels.
With 0 gear, bard also has the best sustain as they gear regen song so early. So, even just solo, they would fare way better than basically all the other melee classes at lower levels. Once you get to 20's, just look forward to mana free charming to 50. (Also, I tank HoT and planar stuff fine on bard, holding aggro ez pz from time 0. Did tank Vindi once from about 30% to dead. Still need bladestoppers cause I want to do VS.) | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Vindi specifically is great since bards are honestly the best enrage tankers. Max aggro with full confidence vindi wont turn around without any sort of white damage / procs that warriors rely on. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
You started off asking if bards are still worth playing because you can't AoE down huge packs and be "the king of solo xp." You then responded to being told that bards can be great group tanks in classic content by scoffing at the idea, acting like the people who said it don't know what they're talking about, and saying that you'd rather have an enchanter tanking because at least they can stun.
You have shown a lack of knowledge about what bards can do in classic eras and you have shown a willful ignorance with the way that you responded to people calling you out for it. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
And not your first refusal to acknowledge that you're wrong about bard capabilities and you were wrong to react the way that you did to people telling you as much.
Still sticking by your statement that you'd rather have an enchanter tanking for a group? | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|