I swear the server is filled with three year olds

[kempoguy80]

Originally Posted by gildor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are an asshole for not communicating with him before taking the camp. Talk people, it goes a long way.

[supercalif]

Agree, separate camps, I’ve done a lot of ice giants in my time and fragmented is incorrect.

[azeth]

I side with Fragmented here. Also that was hardly a childish outburst, he was just clear and forceful with his intentions.

OP arrives to a camp to find the mob dead. He does not contact the individual who cleared the camp and instead waits for respawn then kills it. Then is upset that the individual told him to stop.

[hotkarlmarxbros]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I side with Fragmented here. Also that was hardly a childish outburst, he was just clear and forceful with his intentions.

OP arrives to a camp to find the mob dead. He does not contact the individual who cleared the camp and instead waits for respawn then kills it. Then is upset that the individual told him to stop.

I mean, you're objectively wrong by established rules surrounding how camps work. And I hardly see how it is my responsibility to track down whomever killed a mob at a vacant camp. And is the subsequent KS of two giants before retreating to his two camp something you side with as well?

[azeth]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, you're objectively wrong by established rules surrounding how camps work. And I hardly see how it is my responsibility to track down whomever killed a mob at a vacant camp. And is the subsequent KS of two giants before retreating to his two camp something you side with as well?

Damn you are pretty pissed off about losing this camp, yea?

[hotkarlmarxbros]

Originally Posted by azeth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Damn you are pretty pissed off about losing this camp, yea?

If this were just a one-off incident then sure, I can just let it go. This was the second time I encountered this sort of selfish behavior TODAY, though, and it is getting pretty obnoxious to see over and over again. With only rare instances of repercussions for this kind of behavior, so many people take it up as the default reaction and a totally normal way of interacting with others.

I don't think it is unreasonable to want to play a game where people adhere to the rules and interact with each other respectfully. But as long as these immature assholes continue to see no consequences for this kind of antisocial behavior, it is just going to proliferate and drive away reasonable people that don't want to engage with that sort of nonsense in their free time and we are left with nothing but selfish douchebags on the server.

[Xulia]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, you're objectively wrong by established rules surrounding how camps work. And I hardly see how it is my responsibility to track down whomever killed a mob at a vacant camp.

That's just it though - if he was managing to keep the giant down and was on the other two which aren't very far away the camp wasn't vacant. As much as the consensus seems to be that they're two separate camps, they're also not far from each other at all. I am aware the rules say that one person cannot hold multiple camps, but with this new information about you arriving to find the giant down and waiting for it to spawn... I support the side of the original camper in as far as they weren't acting in a childish manner.

Seems that you both could've communicated better and come to a reasonable agreement.

[Ghostly]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean, you're objectively wrong by established rules surrounding how camps work. And I hardly see how it is my responsibility to track down whomever killed a mob at a vacant camp. And is the subsequent KS of two giants before retreating to his two camp something you side with as well?

"You do not necessarily need to be at the spawn point to call it 'claimed' while it is uncontested, however, if someone else wishes to contest the 'camp' you do need to return to the 'camp' and maintain a presence at or very near the spawn(s) in order to hold it."

You're in the wrong. You went in and stole the camp that you knew was taken without allowing the person holding the camp the chance to either keep or concede it. It's the rule. You broke it. Now you're here making yourself look stupid because you can't understand basic principles.

[hotkarlmarxbros]

Originally Posted by Ghostly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"You do not necessarily need to be at the spawn point to call it 'claimed' while it is uncontested, however, if someone else wishes to contest the 'camp' you do need to return to the 'camp' and maintain a presence at or very near the spawn(s) in order to hold it."

You're in the wrong. You went in and stole the camp that you knew was taken without allowing the person holding the camp the chance to either keep or concede it. It's the rule. You broke it. Now you're here making yourself look stupid because you can't understand basic principles.

You know what, that is fine. If he wanted to claim that camp, there is no problem there. I would just move to the 2 spawn and camp there. But he very clearly did not. He claimed that all three giants belonged to him. So in that case, I came here for clarification of whether this was one camp or two.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. At no point did I break any rules. If you want to say I'm making myself look stupid for my calm and measured replies to his childish outburs then I think that says a lot more about your opinion than mine. If you want to say that he was 'contesting' a mob that he didn't even show up until it was already dotted to death to start crying, and I should've given him the option to sit at the single spawn rather than the two spawn (lol?), then it really just sounds like you're grasping for a reason to call me out while turning a blind eye to him being objectively wrong.

[Ghostly]

Originally Posted by hotkarlmarxbros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know what, that is fine. If he wanted to claim that camp, there is no problem there. I would just move to the 2 spawn and camp there. But he very clearly did not. He claimed that all three giants belonged to him. So in that case, I came here for clarification of whether this was one camp or two.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. At no point did I break any rules. If you want to say I'm making myself look stupid for my calm and measured replies to his childish outburs then I think that says a lot more about your opinion than mine. If you want to say that he was 'contesting' a mob that he didn't even show up until it was already dotted to death to start crying, and I should've given him the option to sit at the single spawn rather than the two spawn (lol?), then it really just sounds like you're grasping for a reason to call me out while turning a blind eye to him being objectively wrong.

Dude, you still don't think you broke a rule?? It is against the rules for you to take the camp without speaking with him first. You've already admitted that you just sat down and took the camp, KNOWING IT WAS CAMPED, without even talking to anyone.

Regardless of what happened after you STOLE his camp, you started this whole thing by being a punk who thought he could just take whatever camp he wanted to.

You're blatantly wrong and grasping at straws at this point. Your failed at your RnF. You're making yourself look worse by sticking to this crybaby shit that you're doing.

You... Were... Wrong...