Someone Translate this wall of text from Omni

[Daloon]

What rules do you need clarified?

Most of the top guilds have gotten together and are deciding what is right/wrong, and its going pretty well all things considered.

Making a thread in Raid Discussion is cringe

[ReadOnly]

Originally Posted by Daloon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Making a thread in Raid Discussion is cringe

Making a thread in Raid Discussion to discuss raids is cringe?

I'd say stop posting before you embarrass yourself but you ruined that in March of 2010.

[Jonabis]

See what happens when a bunch of kittens go off the rails and gets a fear Golem they were DQ'd on? People going crazy!

[FatherSioux]

Omni is asking for clear rules, a simplified ruleset would be easier.

They are suggesting staff create a way to manage the conflicts based around their resources. Reasonable.

They are suggesting a FFA DPS CSR Free style if that's what works best. Reasonable and not in their interest, I wouldn't think.

But here we are and the morons here think they are suggesting some Bernie Sanders approach. Learn to read and think for yourself OP, don't trust anyone around here.

[Alesclandre]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Omni is asking for clear rules, a simplified ruleset would be easier.

They are suggesting staff create a way to manage the conflicts based around their resources. Reasonable.

They are suggesting a FFA DPS CSR Free style if that's what works best. Reasonable and not in their interest, I wouldn't think.

But here we are and the morons here think they are suggesting some Bernie Sanders approach. Learn to read and think for yourself OP, don't trust anyone around here.

Amen

[loramin]

I love how every "it's fine, I don't see a problem" post comes from Aftermath. Like [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] the people benefiting most from the current system think it's fine!

C'mon P99 team, make this a server for everyone again: bring back rotations!

(In b4 "rotations are handouts for less hard working people than us: sharing with othersis un-democratic/un-American/un-capitalist/not classic/the work of the devil!")

[bthomsen0312]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I love how every "it's fine, I don't see a problem" post comes from Aftermath. Like [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] the people benefiting most from the current system think it's fine!

C'mon P99 team, make this a server for everyone again: bring back rotations!

(In b4 "rotations are handouts for less hard working people than us: sharing with othersis un-democratic/un-American/un-capitalist/not classic/the work of the devil!")

hey

theres a thing called live that has instanced raids where you can get your pixels with little effort.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by bthomsen0312 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hey

theres a thing called live that has instanced raids where you can get your pixels with little effort.

hey

When you ignore the reality of an argument and instead rely on a false one (eg. by pretending support for rotations equates to wanting instances) you're being dishonest with whatever you're trying to advocate for.

Presumably, if you hard an honest argument you would have used that instead, but you didn't have one. Which makes sense, because rotations are not instances, they're 100% classic EverQuest, and they would in fact be better for the server as a whole ... but worse for the people benefiting most from the current system.

[Prostatus]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hey

When you ignore the reality of an argument and instead rely on a false one (eg. by pretending support for rotations equates to wanting instances) you're being dishonest with whatever you're trying to advocate for.

Presumably, if you hard an honest argument you would have used that instead, but you didn't have one. Which makes sense, because rotations are not instances, they're 100% classic EverQuest, and they would in fact be better for the server as a whole ... but worse for the people benefiting most from the current system.

This guy still mad that ToV rotation got pulled.

Sad

[bthomsen0312]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hey

When you ignore the reality of an argument and instead rely on a false one (eg. by pretending support for rotations equates to wanting instances) you're being dishonest with whatever you're trying to advocate for.

Presumably, if you hard an honest argument you would have used that instead, but you didn't have one. Which makes sense, because rotations are not instances, they're 100% classic EverQuest, and they would in fact be better for the server as a whole ... but worse for the people benefiting most from the current system.

A. Classic was not rotated very often in my experience on brell, they were DPS races which are even more favorable for the zergs (which I am not a part of)

B. The point is that instanced mobs provide no contest mobs that are equivalent to rotations on a shorter time scale (your rotation would come up once a week instead of one a quarter)

Furthermore, you need to understand that the server has a limited GM pool to deal with server disputes. The rules need to be simplistic that require minimal intervention as these are unpaid volunteers.

The easiest thing for them would be to go back to DPS races without the engage messages necessitating "winning" the mob. You should be very happy this is not the state of raiding.