ugh... ToV rotation wtf??

[Ruhtar]

Originally Posted by Kye1709 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll take Out of Context for 500 Alex.
So, yea, nothing is owed to anyone outside of being able to play a video game they want to without GMs interfering because some other player thinks the way other people are playing the game is "unfair".

Get it?

So nothing is owed to anyone and it's a F2P server, but you want the GMs who run this server to run it the way you want it?

Ok, yeah, I think I understand now. Thank you for clearing that up.

[Kye1709]

Originally Posted by Ruhtar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So nothing is owed to anyone and it's a F2P server, but you want the GMs who run this server to run it the way you want it?

Ok, yeah, I think I understand now. Thank you for clearing that up.

Nah, you still don't understand. Too much fortnite?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Kye1709 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, there are those socking the shit out of targets to make this a reality, but thats their prerogative and they should be rewarded for the time spent no matter what you may think of their life choices/how they spend their time.

Why? Is there some inherent moral argument for why 20-year old game pixels should only go to someone pooping in their sock? Was this part of the classic experience I missed?

[Hotel]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why? Is there some inherent moral argument for why 20-year old game pixels should only go to someone pooping in their sock? Was this part of the classic experience I missed?

Yes there is a moral argument.

Should everyone be able to have a chance for dragons or only a certain group of people. I believe it is more moral when everyone has a chance for dragons than only when a certain group of people have a chance for dragons.

[Mblake1981]

Originally Posted by Hotel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes there is a moral argument.

Should everyone be able to have a chance for dragons or only a certain group of people. I believe it is more moral when everyone has a chance for dragons than only when a certain group of people have a chance for dragons.

Again P99 is its own thing because while a chance for every dragon was a classic thing it was not a reality because only a few could get them during the time when it was the thing to get. You can hope all day long but that and where the rubber met the road are two different things.

This is like a boxing argument. Yes, my roommate boxed a cleric and rogue. But this was when having two computers capable of gaming, let alone one computer, was no where near commonplace. Plus having to purchase two copies, two sub fees, phone lines or forking out the money to get cable hooked up with a router.

It was self policing just like classic dragons.

[Kye1709]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why? Is there some inherent moral argument for why 20-year old game pixels should only go to someone pooping in their sock? Was this part of the classic experience I missed?

You're playing EQ Classic. The exact same video game you played in 1999 (or as close as possible given the coding that exists now). You will never get the "classic experience" because its not 1999, its 2019, and everything outside of the mechanics is different. To use that as an argument for why people shouldn't be able to play the way the want to is [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Kye1709 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're playing EQ Classic. The exact same video game you played in 1999 (or as close as possible given the coding that exists now). You will never get the "classic experience" because its not 1999, its 2019, and everything outside of the mechanics is different. To use that as an argument for why people shouldn't be able to play the way the want to is [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Kye1709 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why people shouldn't be able to play the way the want

Originally Posted by Kye1709 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

people

So ... everyone who agrees with you is a person, and everyone who doesn't is ...?

[BallzDeep]

The fucking democrats won boys.

[LazyHydras]

Can someone explain why they are doing this instead of just rooting the dragons? Am I missing something? Is that technically infeasible on P99?

[Molitoth]

Originally Posted by LazyHydras [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can someone explain why they are doing this instead of just rooting the dragons? Am I missing something? Is that technically infeasible on P99?

It's not "classic" is my guess.