Wall not up

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by America [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

liberalism is for the middle of the curve (Lune). conservatism is for the wings [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

O

[Lune]

Originally Posted by America [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

YUP and there is an ideological point to fix enough dum-dum people to keep palatable socialist murderous tyranny from conquering and destroying

liberalism is for the middle of the curve (Lune). conservatism is for the wings [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd argue it's the other way around, given that a certain huge element of the liberal electorate are, on average, lumped in the lower quartile (James Watson was excommunicated from science for touching that rail), in contrast to the ivory tower intellectuals. If anything it's a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

Meanwhile conservatives are mainly white, middle class, clustered around the mean with their elite being entrepreneurs and bean-counters who are self actualized enough to win the system but not enough to change the world or revolutionize the human condition. Your local rich businessman is probably conservative, but Einstein was a socialist.

[America]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd argue it's the other way around, given that a certain huge element of the liberal electorate are, on average, lumped in the lower quartile (James Watson was excommunicated from science for touching that rail), in contrast to the ivory tower intellectuals. If anything it's the tails of a left-shifted Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

Meanwhile conservatives are mainly white, middle class, clustered around the mean with their elite being entrepreneurs and bean-counters who are self actualized enough to win the system but not enough to change the world or revolutionize the human condition. Your local rich businessman is probably conservative, but Einstein was a socialist.

didn't read

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd argue it's the other way around, given that a certain huge element of the liberal electorate are, on average, lumped in the lower quartile (James Watson was excommunicated from science for touching that rail), in contrast to the ivory tower intellectuals. If anything it's a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

Meanwhile conservatives are mainly white, middle class, clustered around the mean with their elite being entrepreneurs and bean-counters who are self actualized enough to win the system but not enough to change the world or revolutionize the human condition. Your local rich businessman is probably conservative, but Einstein was a socialist.

Changing the world generally happens by accident. Anyone purposefully trying to do so is a dangerous narcissist and lunatic. See: our current president

It’s one thing to wake up in the morning and say, “I should stop polluting.” It’s quite another to demand that others follow suit. I think you’re misinterpreting certain moral leanings for intellectual ones. Einstein, for instance, was human garbage, but undoubtedly intelligent

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Changing the world generally happens by accident. Anyone purposefully trying to do so is a dangerous narcissist and lunatic. See: our current president

It’s one thing to wake up in the morning and saying, “I should stop polluting.” It’s quite another to demand that others follow suit. I think you’re misinterpreting certain moral leanings for intellectual ones. Einstein, for instance, was human garbage, but undoubtedly intelligent

Ya, but Trump is trying to go less against the grain than the Hillary tropes.

People are bat fucking shit insane right now. Especially those demanding equality and handicaps and fairness.

I wrote this epic post last night...

The question :

“Female sports can exist if they exist outside of the government within private society.”

So no women’s teams at public schools, then? What about men’s teams? Or are they just a given.

My response:

Really good question.

Issues of funding I think. The fed gov could fund unisex classes teaching softball or volleyball or football and soccer or whatever.

Everyone regardless of sex have the opportunity to learn and train for how to run safely and ergonomically. Running properly is an art, it wasn't even trained properly in the military. Sprinting is different as well.

Those funds don't need to go to a segregated class for teaching.

If the PTA or city I guess want have a bakesale or separate additional membership to create segregated competitive teams, they should.

But everyone can learn how to play basketball, shoot hoops, and make dunks in the same class IMO.

The primary role of public schools are to educate. Education of fitness is not something that needs to be taught separately. The games are roughly the same.

As far as safety, definitely kids shouldn't be playing full tackle all out football against either sex or gender when one kid is totally out classed in size or physicality.

As a noob in hand to hand training I was taught to never underestimate my opponents even if they where 5'1".

Again, martial training falls into its not about competition, it's about defense or offense against a diverse set of opponents.

We as a people are constantly handicapping ourselves and our children trying to make everything perfectly fair.

Should a person with male muscle mass, density, and hormones wrestle competatively against natal females in a contest? Imo no. But can they train together. Ya. In most cases.

Also the class can be mixed for training, but say running sprints, you can have 1st prize, 1st prize male, 1st prize female etc..

The government simply can just stay out of it. We should fund public schools in such a way as females aren't excluded and males vice versa.

I mean cheerleaders have always been pretty coed. Most classes I took where coed. So the sexes compete in different prizes. Big woop. I am not trying to be the fastest female or woman on the track. I am trying to be the fastest period. Or at least faster than myself ;p

Ps I like where you're going, but also want to mention that because of my size and ability, I was discriminated against in sports. Always picked last. I still learned to play and gave it my all.

I felt it sucked aswell competing against guys who where all far superior. I was a tough kid, but I didn't really make the cut as a boy either. Perhaps in a coed class I would have had a more evenly matched team to play in? We won't know if we don't allow for it because we use an outdated model where there's no room for compromise because we we sorted all out according to the law. Not individual ability, or individuality ;p

Tldr: everyone wants to use the federal government to place individuals on sports teams.

What the fuck. This is un-American and some ignorant socialistic communist dictator crap.

My free market private solutions above are what we've always had before and the God damned courts need to protect.

Caveat: the fed stays entirely out of private business spaces and schools and lets them regulate themselves as they see fit.

The public school is a privilege we grant to the lowest common denominator in an effort to raise them up from poverty and ignorance.

[mickmoranis]

https://youtu.be/MuBHJbEEVUA

Important questions

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://youtu.be/MuBHJbEEVUA

Important questions

if you cant debate with someone who doesnt share your goals, you're a shitty debater.

[Ahldagor]

The year the wall.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if you cant debate with someone who doesnt share your goals, you're a shitty debater.

Boy, you are ignorant as shit.

He means goals of the debate.

[misterbonkers]

demonizing white people

you got a good belly laugh out of me