Why Harry Potter Should Have Carried A 1911 - Page 9

clevergirl · #1 10-10-2018, 04:23 PM

Nazi is a really inaccurate term these days. It shouldn't be used.

Wonkie · #2 10-10-2018, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clevergirl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nazi is a really inaccurate term these days. It shouldn't be used.

Quote:

Originally Posted by misterbonkers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

clevergirl · #3 10-10-2018, 06:11 PM

Speedrunning the quake games doesn't usually require much killing.

Raev · #4 10-10-2018, 08:15 PM

This thread is funny because loramin is clearly smarter than SC, and yet gets everything wrong anyway. Some things are so stupid they can only believed by someone who went to college (and watches huge quantities of CNN).

Also I have to call out Ahlgador for low posting quality. You need to have more words in your repertoire than 'weak'. My personal favorite word is 'defenestration'. It's hard to work into a message board flame but I have faith in you.

ScaringChildren · #5 10-10-2018, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread is funny because loramin is clearly smarter than SC, and yet gets everything wrong anyway. Some things are so stupid they can only believed by someone who went to college (and watches huge quantities of CNN).

Also I have to call out Ahlgador for low posting quality. You need to have more words in your repertoire than 'weak'. My personal favorite word is 'defenestration'. It's hard to work into a message board flame but I have faith in you.

Thanks for your "support", bud.

loramin · #6 10-10-2018, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread is funny because loramin is clearly smarter than SC, and yet gets everything wrong anyway. Some things are so stupid they can only believed by someone who went to college (and watches huge quantities of CNN).

Also I have to call out Ahlgador for low posting quality. You need to have more words in your repertoire than 'weak'. My personal favorite word is 'defenestration'. It's hard to work into a message board flame but I have faith in you.

Thanks, but I actually don't watch news at all; I just read Google News.

But what specifically did I "get wrong"?

Raev · #7 10-11-2018, 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But what specifically did I "get wrong"?

SC intuitively understands that people need to be innocent until proven guilty, and since Kavanaugh was on trial in the court of public opinion reasonably applied this standard. Meanwhile your argument was semantics bullshit about whether or not he was actually on trial.

P.S. Have you read the wikipedia page on false rape accusations? They devote 3 full paragraphs to the critics of Kanin's 1990 study that showed 40% of rape allegations were false, and the best the critics can do is 'Kanin did not massage the police department's statistics to make feminists look better - that asshole!'

loramin · #8 10-12-2018, 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SC intuitively understands that people need to be innocent until proven guilty, and since Kavanaugh was on trial in the court of public opinion reasonably applied this standard. Meanwhile your argument was semantics bullshit about whether or not he was actually on trial.

P.S. Have you read the wikipedia page on false rape accusations? They devote 3 full paragraphs to the critics of Kanin's 1990 study that showed 40% of rape allegations were false, and the best the critics can do is 'Kanin did not massage the police department's statistics to make feminists look better - that asshole!'

My "semantic bullshit" just shows I understand a fundamental concept of the law works in our country and you don't.

And as for Kanin, there's this thing called "cherry-picking". It's when you fixate on a single data point that proves whatever it is you want to believe, and ignore all the other data points that don't fit your beliefs.

ScaringChildren · #9 10-12-2018, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My "semantic bullshit" just shows I understand a fundamental concept of the law works in our country and you don't.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maskedmelon · #10 10-12-2018, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My "semantic bullshit" just shows I understand a fundamental concept of the law works in our country and you don't.

And as for Kanin, there's this thing called "cherry-picking". It's when you fixate on a single data point that proves whatever it is you want to believe, and ignore all the other data points that don't fit your beliefs.

it ain't about law, you big cuddly goober. it's about the principles of decency and fairness upon which law is based. we could abolish laws against theft tomorrow, but it wouldn't make theft right.